Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
References: <20201219175713.18888-1-nramas@linux.microsoft.com>
 <20201219175713.18888-3-nramas@linux.microsoft.com>
 <87blell6g2.fsf@manicouagan.localdomain>
 <6d7e0147-b5e4-d364-af7d-c089217e3fb0@linux.microsoft.com>
User-agent: mu4e 1.4.10; emacs 27.1
From:   Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>
To:     Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com>
Cc:     zohar@linux.ibm.com, robh@kernel.org, takahiro.akashi@linaro.org,
        gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, will@kernel.org,
        catalin.marinas@arm.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au, james.morse@arm.com,
        sashal@kernel.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org,
        frowand.list@gmail.com, vincenzo.frascino@arm.com,
        mark.rutland@arm.com, dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com, jmorris@namei.org,
        serge@hallyn.com, pasha.tatashin@soleen.com, allison@lohutok.net,
        masahiroy@kernel.org, bhsharma@redhat.com, mbrugger@suse.com,
        hsinyi@chromium.org, tao.li@vivo.com, christophe.leroy@c-s.fr,
        prsriva@linux.microsoft.com, balajib@linux.microsoft.com,
        linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 2/6] powerpc: Move arch independent ima kexec
 functions to drivers/of/kexec.c
In-reply-to: <6d7e0147-b5e4-d364-af7d-c089217e3fb0@linux.microsoft.com>
Date:   Wed, 23 Dec 2020 14:57:21 -0300
Message-ID: <87r1ngv20u.fsf@manicouagan.localdomain>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: bulk


Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com> writes:

> On 12/22/20 4:19 PM, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
>> Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com> writes:
>> 
>>> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
>>> index 6ebefec616e4..7c3947ad3773 100644
>>> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
>>> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
>>> @@ -24,10 +24,6 @@
>>>     #include "../integrity.h"
>>>   -#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_IMA_KEXEC
>>> -#include <asm/ima.h>
>>> -#endif
>>> -
>>>   enum ima_show_type { IMA_SHOW_BINARY, IMA_SHOW_BINARY_NO_FIELD_LEN,
>>>   		     IMA_SHOW_BINARY_OLD_STRING_FMT, IMA_SHOW_ASCII };
>>>   enum tpm_pcrs { TPM_PCR0 = 0, TPM_PCR8 = 8, TPM_PCR10 = 10 };
>> This belongs in patch 1.
>
> No - the reference to "asm/ima.h" cannot be removed in Patch #1 since
> ima_get_kexec_buffer() and ima_free_kexec_buffer() are still declared in 
> this header. They are moved in this patch only (Patch #2).

Indeed, you are right. My mistake.

>>> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c
>>> index 38bcd7543e27..8a6712981dee 100644
>>> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c
>>> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c
>>> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
>>>   #include <linux/seq_file.h>
>>>   #include <linux/vmalloc.h>
>>>   #include <linux/kexec.h>
>>> +#include <linux/of.h>
>>>   #include <linux/ima.h>
>>>   #include "ima.h"
>> This include isn't necessary.
>
> This change is necessary because ima_get_kexec_buffer() and
> ima_free_kexec_buffer() are now declared in "linux/of.h".

You are right here as well. Before I made the suggestion, I had tested
building the kernel without the include above and it worked fine, but
that's because <linux/of.h> is being included indirectly by some other
header file. It's better to include it explicitly.

-- 
Thiago Jung Bauermann
IBM Linux Technology Center