Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:f347:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp6209953pxu; Wed, 23 Dec 2020 17:27:49 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzgcvqEffPOvhV0IGN8OtrBcJmPocM515TfiWI2XKinqU82M1ptokOJTc4tIdJWyUnVO+rg X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:9452:: with SMTP id z18mr26556672ejx.389.1608773269251; Wed, 23 Dec 2020 17:27:49 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1608773269; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=e4KVJt1zuL9hMZhREVNTbQ/6rnwHwYRcsNntAwhIqgyFz9sX4tx+hYkdBiddf5n+rb Ahuc1mLzD3eNhcdkqKIcYg+CEPO+DtAqzuEaLfCQZO9Yqrdc3MzQMANn6FGLy07Hs+m3 RkxHNLcig9oZpWDMGL5+GcnnQAoxoUCqA0rdurbv2WWsBpHCxLb0pDSl2MXTpi4uzsJY y//G/4GxSTDgUUeOBhmgXdCZRr2q5uXYFQB92JmAY79ie9FUgYRJnJuTLG2d8KfPy8HZ LFsXNtrlZBI15KhTVya5+FNAZZOuIHjZGSYKfDzIhwF6CWQ9IhtRnPqMxDmRtLZgMHpa kypQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject:ironport-sdr:ironport-sdr; bh=oZ4qoEgMwhqXievJHZHmayKJdao9OD8BkwN5nwHTlqk=; b=F2Tq0iPeatbH9GJsyBJe951AxW5KaOmpEMHwDKzqeB0WDMxOeMkT3utLwCbXO9/mbq 4fxQogJAFeF/ygRHUC8GeLYcElodqBVDMNAipW0qF9z0xXZ5IbXii1b/BOUoqvtkAjiI yNVOcjQW88pUMM8Qah5Bqb14Db5p7ZxevlZT4HMvyoIjMEq7SlAGCRz9dCc2/hCvGLM6 jIaVR8weZ23+m+QJ6NHqyEpdef4Z4FJcWGcj5xLgbk/TyheL1dPeXUaozSaMEXKn8OuP Pv1ChoWXTT4ygowCkO9eF1SeyXWnORHhqxcX8lxLfdHO3ZjUltQcdsNWy2CYilFaxg2s ji6g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id dk23si15724741edb.17.2020.12.23.17.27.26; Wed, 23 Dec 2020 17:27:49 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728342AbgLXB0l (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 23 Dec 2020 20:26:41 -0500 Received: from mga18.intel.com ([134.134.136.126]:40181 "EHLO mga18.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726250AbgLXB0l (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Dec 2020 20:26:41 -0500 IronPort-SDR: cYCPz5h7PcGBIMXHGKmUVVwEf3xBgcT16qliEdsrENgLhWRRhLxJIETpq1hW9B6+W5hFAWWYf3 yMR5dZds5CFQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9844"; a="163816412" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.78,443,1599548400"; d="scan'208";a="163816412" Received: from orsmga008.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.65]) by orsmga106.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Dec 2020 17:24:55 -0800 IronPort-SDR: +Pyw6Ryoez+cnIuvFW4lyQfBD0E8oSndD9UvQ6XTmNFUG2mm0Dp6bKqZq2I1+O+IEhegk5O8In TB+tGXISE8uQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.78,443,1599548400"; d="scan'208";a="374192333" Received: from yjin15-mobl1.ccr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.238.4.27]) ([10.238.4.27]) by orsmga008-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Dec 2020 17:24:52 -0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf stat: Fix wrong skipping for per-die aggregation To: Jiri Olsa Cc: acme@kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ak@linux.intel.com, kan.liang@intel.com, yao.jin@intel.com, James Clark References: <20201216070146.11769-1-yao.jin@linux.intel.com> <20201223223545.GC236568@krava> From: "Jin, Yao" Message-ID: <1a963057-7db5-6604-af02-2246be19284d@linux.intel.com> Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2020 09:24:49 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20201223223545.GC236568@krava> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/24/2020 6:35 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote: > On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 03:01:46PM +0800, Jin Yao wrote: >> Uncore becomes die-scope on Xeon Cascade Lake-AP and perf has supported >> --per-die aggregation yet. >> >> One issue is found in check_per_pkg() for uncore events running on >> AP system. On cascade Lake-AP, we have: >> >> S0-D0 >> S0-D1 >> S1-D0 >> S1-D1 >> >> But in check_per_pkg(), S0-D1 and S1-D1 are skipped because the >> mask bits for S0 and S1 have been set for S0-D0 and S1-D0. It doesn't >> check die_id. So the counting for S0-D1 and S1-D1 are set to zero. >> That's not correct. >> >> root@lkp-csl-2ap4 ~# ./perf stat -a -I 1000 -e llc_misses.mem_read --per-die -- sleep 5 >> 1.001460963 S0-D0 1 1317376 Bytes llc_misses.mem_read >> 1.001460963 S0-D1 1 998016 Bytes llc_misses.mem_read >> 1.001460963 S1-D0 1 970496 Bytes llc_misses.mem_read >> 1.001460963 S1-D1 1 1291264 Bytes llc_misses.mem_read >> 2.003488021 S0-D0 1 1082048 Bytes llc_misses.mem_read >> 2.003488021 S0-D1 1 1919040 Bytes llc_misses.mem_read >> 2.003488021 S1-D0 1 890752 Bytes llc_misses.mem_read >> 2.003488021 S1-D1 1 2380800 Bytes llc_misses.mem_read >> 3.005613270 S0-D0 1 1126080 Bytes llc_misses.mem_read >> 3.005613270 S0-D1 1 2898176 Bytes llc_misses.mem_read >> 3.005613270 S1-D0 1 870912 Bytes llc_misses.mem_read >> 3.005613270 S1-D1 1 3388608 Bytes llc_misses.mem_read >> 4.007627598 S0-D0 1 1124608 Bytes llc_misses.mem_read >> 4.007627598 S0-D1 1 3884416 Bytes llc_misses.mem_read >> 4.007627598 S1-D0 1 921088 Bytes llc_misses.mem_read >> 4.007627598 S1-D1 1 4451840 Bytes llc_misses.mem_read >> 5.001479927 S0-D0 1 963328 Bytes llc_misses.mem_read >> 5.001479927 S0-D1 1 4831936 Bytes llc_misses.mem_read >> 5.001479927 S1-D0 1 895104 Bytes llc_misses.mem_read >> 5.001479927 S1-D1 1 5496640 Bytes llc_misses.mem_read >> >> From above output, we can see S0-D1 and S1-D1 don't report the interval >> values, they are continued to grow. That's because check_per_pkg() wrongly >> decides to use zero counts for S0-D1 and S1-D1. >> >> So in check_per_pkg(), we should use a pair of die_id + socket_id to >> decide if this cpu counts needs to skip. Only considering socket_id is >> not enough. >> >> Now with this patch, >> >> root@lkp-csl-2ap4 ~# ./perf stat -a -I 1000 -e llc_misses.mem_read --per-die -- sleep 5 >> 1.001622560 S0-D0 1 1210176 Bytes llc_misses.mem_read >> 1.001622560 S0-D1 1 950208 Bytes llc_misses.mem_read >> 1.001622560 S1-D0 1 968704 Bytes llc_misses.mem_read >> 1.001622560 S1-D1 1 1113280 Bytes llc_misses.mem_read >> 2.004399430 S0-D0 1 1258560 Bytes llc_misses.mem_read >> 2.004399430 S0-D1 1 1011008 Bytes llc_misses.mem_read >> 2.004399430 S1-D0 1 1036544 Bytes llc_misses.mem_read >> 2.004399430 S1-D1 1 1237376 Bytes llc_misses.mem_read >> 3.006535657 S0-D0 1 1036608 Bytes llc_misses.mem_read >> 3.006535657 S0-D1 1 906560 Bytes llc_misses.mem_read >> 3.006535657 S1-D0 1 994112 Bytes llc_misses.mem_read >> 3.006535657 S1-D1 1 1025472 Bytes llc_misses.mem_read >> 4.008934402 S0-D0 1 1005120 Bytes llc_misses.mem_read >> 4.008934402 S0-D1 1 882368 Bytes llc_misses.mem_read >> 4.008934402 S1-D0 1 961408 Bytes llc_misses.mem_read >> 4.008934402 S1-D1 1 988352 Bytes llc_misses.mem_read >> 5.001605406 S0-D0 1 1930240 Bytes llc_misses.mem_read >> 5.001605406 S0-D1 1 1134272 Bytes llc_misses.mem_read >> 5.001605406 S1-D0 1 1531136 Bytes llc_misses.mem_read >> 5.001605406 S1-D1 1 2230848 Bytes llc_misses.mem_read >> >> On no-die system, die_id is 0, this patch keeps original behavior unchanged. >> >> Reported-by: Huang Ying >> Signed-off-by: Jin Yao >> --- >> tools/perf/util/cpumap.h | 2 ++ >> tools/perf/util/stat.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++---- >> 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/cpumap.h b/tools/perf/util/cpumap.h >> index 3a442f021468..58604c047121 100644 >> --- a/tools/perf/util/cpumap.h >> +++ b/tools/perf/util/cpumap.h >> @@ -7,6 +7,8 @@ >> #include >> #include >> >> +#define CPU_MAP_MAX_DIE 256 >> + >> struct perf_record_cpu_map_data; >> >> struct perf_cpu_map *perf_cpu_map__empty_new(int nr); >> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/stat.c b/tools/perf/util/stat.c >> index 1e125e39ff84..b3fc6e261fe0 100644 >> --- a/tools/perf/util/stat.c >> +++ b/tools/perf/util/stat.c >> @@ -282,9 +282,9 @@ static void zero_per_pkg(struct evsel *counter) >> static int check_per_pkg(struct evsel *counter, >> struct perf_counts_values *vals, int cpu, bool *skip) >> { >> - unsigned long *mask = counter->per_pkg_mask; >> + unsigned long *mask = counter->per_pkg_mask, *l; >> struct perf_cpu_map *cpus = evsel__cpus(counter); >> - int s; >> + int s, d; >> >> *skip = false; >> >> @@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ static int check_per_pkg(struct evsel *counter, >> return 0; >> >> if (!mask) { >> - mask = zalloc(cpu__max_cpu()); >> + mask = zalloc(cpu__max_cpu() * CPU_MAP_MAX_DIE); >> if (!mask) >> return -ENOMEM; >> >> @@ -317,7 +317,20 @@ static int check_per_pkg(struct evsel *counter, >> if (s < 0) >> return -1; >> >> - *skip = test_and_set_bit(s, mask) == 1; >> + d = cpu_map__get_die(cpus, cpu, NULL); >> + if (d < 0) >> + return -1; >> + >> + /* >> + * On multi-die system, die_id < 256. We use a pair >> + * of socket + die to identify the used bit. >> + * On no-die system, die_id is 0, l = &mask[0]. It doesn't >> + * change original "test_and_set_bit(s, mask)" behavior. >> + */ >> + d &= 0xff; >> + l = &mask[d]; > > James is fixing the aggregation, because we could get large socket numbers: > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201126141328.6509-1-james.clark@arm.com/ > James is using "struct cpu_aggr_map" to replace "struct perf_cpu_map", but do we also need to replace the "struct perf_cpu_map" in "struct perf_evsel"? Otherwise the evsel->cpus will be inconsistent, right? struct perf_evsel { ... struct perf_cpu_map *cpus; struct perf_cpu_map *own_cpus; ... }; > I think we should fix that in here as well Yes, we need to fix that in check_per_pkg() as well. As I said above, in check_per_pkg(), struct perf_cpu_map *cpus = evsel__cpus(counter); we should use "struct cpu_aggr_map" here. > maybe just use hashmap (socket,die) -> bool ? > Yes, hashmap should be better, saving more memory. Thanks Jin Yao > jirka > >> + >> + *skip = test_and_set_bit(s, l) == 1; >> return 0; >> } >> >> -- >> 2.17.1 >> >