Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 4 Nov 2001 13:42:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 4 Nov 2001 13:42:19 -0500 Received: from Expansa.sns.it ([192.167.206.189]:45326 "EHLO Expansa.sns.it") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 4 Nov 2001 13:42:10 -0500 Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2001 19:41:53 +0100 (CET) From: Luigi Genoni To: cc: Ted Deppner , Dan Kegel , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: Regression testing of 2.4.x before release? In-Reply-To: <3BE52ECB.DFE7B040@laas.fr> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Most of us just developed their own stress test, depending on what they do need. Then many use dbench, cerberus and so on. I would suggest you to start with cerberus. Luigi On Sun, 4 Nov 2001, Tahar wrote: > > > Yes it would. It would be a better idea if everyone (including you and > > me) stress test those pre and final kernels too. > > Just a newbie question: where can we find such stress tests, and what > are the kernel parts targeted by these tests ? > > Thanks, > > Tahar > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/