Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 15/48] opp: Support set_opp() customization without
 requiring to use regulators
To:     Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Peter Geis <pgwipeout@gmail.com>,
        Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart@gmail.com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
        Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@nvidia.com>,
        Viresh Kumar <vireshk@kernel.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
        devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
        linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-clk@vger.kernel.org
References: <20201217180638.22748-1-digetx@gmail.com>
 <20201217180638.22748-16-digetx@gmail.com>
 <20201223060101.v2qihvvgsmpahg24@vireshk-i7>
 <ea025b0f-bb2a-d075-4c8e-45831fa9cd93@gmail.com>
 <20201224041025.mlxsbl2yrxyqt7yh@vireshk-i7>
From:   Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <236f9306-97a5-5f17-9689-a6e04c052b7a@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 24 Dec 2020 15:16:42 +0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.4.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20201224041025.mlxsbl2yrxyqt7yh@vireshk-i7>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

24.12.2020 07:10, Viresh Kumar пишет:
> On 23-12-20, 23:38, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> Well, there is no "same structure", the opp_table->set_opp_data is NULL
>> there.
> 
> Right, I saw that yesterday. What I meant was that we need to start allocating
> the structure for this case now.
> 

Okay, that will be a bit bigger change than this v2. I'll try it
implement yours suggestion in the next revision, thanks.