Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20201224010907.263125-1-djrscally@gmail.com> <20201224010907.263125-8-djrscally@gmail.com>
 <CAHp75Vft7gg1AcKCEU+E74eB_ZMouHFd-8uZ7pcVj5CoJzZpvQ@mail.gmail.com> <X+SPsks5itN9OFqB@pendragon.ideasonboard.com>
In-Reply-To: <X+SPsks5itN9OFqB@pendragon.ideasonboard.com>
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 24 Dec 2020 15:03:18 +0200
Message-ID: <CAHp75Ve6YHm-tdqFPvOhfJiT=uRK_dpKY3mnhQd6Mg3KkSuKqA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/14] software_node: Add support for fwnode_graph*()
 family of functions
To:     Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Cc:     Daniel Scally <djrscally@gmail.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
        devel@acpica.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
        Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Yong Zhi <yong.zhi@intel.com>,
        Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
        Bingbu Cao <bingbu.cao@intel.com>,
        Tian Shu Qiu <tian.shu.qiu@intel.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
        Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>,
        Erik Kaneda <erik.kaneda@intel.com>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
        Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
        Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>,
        Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@jmondi.org>,
        kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com,
        Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl>,
        Marco Felsch <m.felsch@pengutronix.de>,
        niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se,
        Steve Longerbeam <slongerbeam@gmail.com>,
        "Krogerus, Heikki" <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 2:55 PM Laurent Pinchart
<laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 02:24:12PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 3:14 AM Daniel Scally wrote:

...

> > > +               if (!strncmp(to_swnode(port)->node->name, "port@",
> >
> > You may use here corresponding _FMT macro.
> >
> > > +                            FWNODE_GRAPH_PORT_NAME_PREFIX_LEN))
> > > +                       return port;

...

> > > +       /* Ports have naming style "port@n", we need to select the n */
> >
> > > +       ret = kstrtou32(swnode->parent->node->name + FWNODE_GRAPH_PORT_NAME_PREFIX_LEN,
> >
> > Maybe a temporary variable?
> >
> >   unsigned int prefix_len = FWNODE_GRAPH_PORT_NAME_PREFIX_LEN;
> >   ...
> >   ret = kstrtou32(swnode->parent->node->name + prefix_len,
>
> Honestly I'm wondering if those macros don't hinder readability. I'd
> rather write
>
>         + strlen("port@")

Works for me, since the compiler optimizes this away to be a plain constant.

> and let the compiler optimize this to a compile-time constant.
>
> > > +                       10, &endpoint->port);
> > > +       if (ret)
> > > +               return ret;


-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko