Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20201218170919.2950-1-jiangshanlai@gmail.com> <20201226103421.6616-1-hdanton@sina.com>
 <20201226145239.GJ2657@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72>
In-Reply-To: <20201226145239.GJ2657@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72>
From:   Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 27 Dec 2020 22:08:51 +0800
Message-ID: <CAJhGHyBGb_fBqp7-XCD0bkZOt5E_aPKwkViY3PUN1MVZuBE3KA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip V2 00/10] workqueue: break affinity initiatively
To:     "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc:     Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Qian Cai <cai@redhat.com>,
        Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@arm.com>,
        Lai Jiangshan <laijs@linux.alibaba.com>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Dec 26, 2020 at 10:52 PM Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> wrote:

> >
> > Can you please specify a bit what you encountered in rcutorture
> > before this patchset? You know we cant have a correct estimation
> > of the fix diameter without your help.

>
> It triggers the following in sched_cpu_dying() in kernel/sched/core.c,
> exactly the same as for Lai Jiangshan:
>
>         BUG_ON(rq->nr_running != 1 || rq_has_pinned_tasks(rq))
>
> Which is in fact the "this" in my earlier "rcutorture hits this".  ;-)
>
>                                                         Thanx, Paul
>

Hi, Hillf

https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/12/22/141

From the email, I think rcutorture encountered the same problem.

Hi, Paul

I'm sorry to forget to add your Tested-by.

Thanks
Lai