Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:f347:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp8508725pxu; Sun, 27 Dec 2020 08:56:20 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzjoaFFglKGqp+WVc8/U09eMdezvIAfMZeOQYvLgIgxTP9nb3zrTAMr8F7xzJZ7zYPIDYdp X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:1607:: with SMTP id hb7mr37804451ejc.81.1609088179872; Sun, 27 Dec 2020 08:56:19 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1609088179; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=S8DggHHxH4MUaJ6VZUQlCvB7tbwc5spHPHmUoXah/WgIwpwqMnTNW+nPZKTNJ75BG5 OMeRYLf4hHHnaVRAGNSbrOFWU5TcYSblxzYC82pW3Vp4f2HNZAHyEGrMemS8G6j/YDwg 6g3eo7MjH7BOfuQWCSxS7RUdbLe/ltg774PGAmO9BZ1zgIffK+kDwK+UzqDV6p3WJ4VF /2bHkRVdTcZO5yreH+724lYFhWU6RUbpveBIR+nA81AHPGETBqwAZNS6BB0bli6XU8/Q GFvpkzd7UqlwcJ0lyn2Stv4EbGLmfuM6KPkaCy7TRjokWDpLfofm+CzsNcvkyufua0x1 sXmw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=lmWpBWXcOurctmoycoJSzdDSNeYFpu+Rg9JhUql7Ego=; b=pR3yjq9bl2C6uwoKxRRSkXPwvSTyU607XwOiauTCeE6MLDmUl/HtbYpWH3bWIMsQ5U y2Qb9LYaM8JHcZw/+cq8RKxjVEUUEzDkZw8gfvxWH5/fOqcaiFv22QBOfWjxDiP7tcnO A7BvI680CVUrOD8ejFwVTUKGYDxpbrGnbpEzkqMc3aLdSlSGSfzAQUV01dLuf6UTaRKe L/6/P2JuzFLJE8c8UUdLkO54Ok9Te6rZHbiE0J5WUvHJnLWgDfqbvnx5HaEENt1RMYFi CpFFP+Uo29oUqjGpBOfSeVo3VoP1uJRzSCx2cZH+eGRvEXnvrNqY0JrKR2N5c9wRFutr 5mcQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=MUUvBuAV; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v18si18899690edd.267.2020.12.27.08.55.57; Sun, 27 Dec 2020 08:56:19 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=MUUvBuAV; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726140AbgL0Qz3 (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 27 Dec 2020 11:55:29 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:36788 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726032AbgL0Qz3 (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Dec 2020 11:55:29 -0500 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4EA9622512; Sun, 27 Dec 2020 16:54:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1609088088; bh=DBPbQXCZ/7Qw5VXBdV3/F053S+d3UwPj2quilP6sf6c=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=MUUvBuAV6Hzlk8raDUOCeaOJxuQzcTp5CQ3EBGe64uxHHBH0tieZsOJAXO/QrV92N qZkWYRVkxf0XdQ1uFmTDM7Z+uxI2o5UKkL0HyeQ14j7oejEwysbm3PSF6OjHeEiBJk iv3pMEDTsPWFYej7idNusLA3MUjoW7wj0mM/1eRM= Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2020 17:56:12 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Jussi Kivilinna Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, lwn@lwn.net, jslaby@suse.cz Subject: Re: LXC broken with 5.10-stable?, ok with 5.9-stable (Re: Linux 5.10.3) Message-ID: References: <16089960203931@kroah.com> <5ab86253-7703-e892-52b7-e6a8af579822@iki.fi> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5ab86253-7703-e892-52b7-e6a8af579822@iki.fi> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Dec 27, 2020 at 06:32:41PM +0200, Jussi Kivilinna wrote: > Hello, > > Now that 5.9 series is EOL, I tried to move to 5.10.3. I ran in to regression where LXC containers do not start with newer kernel. I found that issue had been reported (bisected + with reduced test case) in bugzilla at: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=209971 > > Has this been fixed in 5.11-rc? Is there any patch that I could backport and test with 5.10? Have you tried Linus's tree to see if this works yet? If not, it should be a simple fix. See 7cfc630e63b4 ("proc "single files": switch to ->read_iter") as an example of what is needed here. I think we will see a lot of these "/proc files need to be fixed up" issues over time as this is something that we hit in the 5.10-rc sequence and fixed a bunch of them already... thanks, greg k-h