Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Mon, 28 Dec 2020 11:52:54 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To:     Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
Cc:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Peter Geis <pgwipeout@gmail.com>,
        Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart@gmail.com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
        Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@nvidia.com>,
        Viresh Kumar <vireshk@kernel.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
        devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
        linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-clk@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/48] opp: Add dev_pm_opp_find_level_ceil()
Message-ID: <20201228062254.ui727ka2ftijov4m@vireshk-i7>
References: <20201217180638.22748-1-digetx@gmail.com>
 <20201217180638.22748-12-digetx@gmail.com>
 <20201222064253.x7vsurh7q5k7qzb5@vireshk-i7>
 <fd7b9f42-d0a7-45eb-2a17-d46779011c58@gmail.com>
 <20201223041931.klnppy4fu3sdgtsz@vireshk-i7>
 <f00e0c74-8d9a-d3d3-81bb-3ac25a74175d@gmail.com>
 <20201224064339.zngidobhstnlu2a3@vireshk-i7>
 <780db190-d93d-3bca-4819-790010f82c62@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <780db190-d93d-3bca-4819-790010f82c62@gmail.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716-391-311a52
Precedence: bulk

On 24-12-20, 16:00, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> In a device driver I want to set PD to the lowest performance state by
> removing the performance vote when dev_pm_opp_set_rate(dev, 0) is
> invoked by the driver.
> 
> The OPP core already does this, but if OPP levels don't start from 0 in
> a device-tree for PD, then it currently doesn't work since there is a
> need to get a rounded-up performance state because
> dev_pm_opp_set_voltage() takes OPP entry for the argument (patches 9 and
> 28).
> 
> The PD powering off and performance-changes are separate from each other
> in the GENPD core. The GENPD core automatically turns off domain when
> all devices within the domain are suspended by system-suspend or RPM.
> 
> The performance state of a power domain is controlled solely by a device
> driver. GENPD core only aggregates the performance requests, it doesn't
> change the performance state of a domain by itself when device is
> suspended or resumed, IIUC this is intentional. And I want to put domain
> into lowest performance state when device is suspended.

Right, so if you really want to just drop the performance vote, then with a
value of 0 for the performance state the call will reach to your genpd's
callback ->set_performance_state(). Just as dev_pm_opp_set_rate() accepts the
frequency to be 0, I would expect dev_pm_opp_set_rate() to accept opp argument
as NULL and in that case set voltage to 0 and do regulator_disable() as well.
Won't that work better than going for the lowest voltage ?

-- 
viresh