Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751272AbWIFSA1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Sep 2006 14:00:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751274AbWIFSA1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Sep 2006 14:00:27 -0400 Received: from 1wt.eu ([62.212.114.60]:11026 "EHLO 1wt.eu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751272AbWIFSA0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Sep 2006 14:00:26 -0400 Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 20:00:20 +0200 From: Willy Tarreau To: Rick Ellis Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: bogofilter ate 3/5 Message-ID: <20060906180020.GD604@1wt.eu> References: <200609060537.k865b3W8007370@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200609060537.k865b3W8007370@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 999 Lines: 28 On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 10:37:03PM -0700, Rick Ellis wrote: > On Wed, 6 Sep 2006 07:00:44 +0200 Willy Tarreau wrote: > > > spam has never been a real problem for me on LKML > > I spend a lot of time deleting spam from the mailing lists I > archive. The kernel list gets a lot of spam--it's just not > as obvious as it is on some lists because of the large amount > of legit traffic. Some of the slower lists get nothing but > spam for weeks at a time. agreed, but I still think that losing some legitimate emails is worse than getting 5% spam. > While bogofilter may not be the answer, doing something may > be quite desirable. OK, but doing something could simply consist in adding a header that anyone is free to filter on or not. Regards, Willy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/