Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750909AbWIFS4o (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Sep 2006 14:56:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751185AbWIFS4n (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Sep 2006 14:56:43 -0400 Received: from vzn1-20146.ce.pixelgate.net ([66.254.95.226]:58762 "EHLO spinics.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750909AbWIFS4n (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Sep 2006 14:56:43 -0400 From: ellis@spinics.net Message-Id: <200609061856.k86IuS61017253@no.spam> Subject: Re: bogofilter ate 3/5 To: w@1wt.eu (Willy Tarreau) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 11:56:28 -0700 (PDT) Cc: ellis@spinics.net (Rick Ellis), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20060906180020.GD604@1wt.eu> from "Willy Tarreau" at Sep 06, 2006 08:00:20 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 673 Lines: 17 > OK, but doing something could simply consist in adding a header > that anyone is free to filter on or not. The problem with that is the post gets no indication that his mail has been filtered. The way it works now is the rejection happens at SMTP time and that causes the poster to see the problem. If people filtered on a header, you'd never know why you weren't getting a response. -- http://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/