Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:f347:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp9468757pxu; Mon, 28 Dec 2020 17:39:25 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwYb2OqbpaMdrCnh35uEu8GQbc63+HY2RMdWu9Ubf8mIWxZ1YT8vmR6IoF6yjkhtt9H42wo X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:46:: with SMTP id f6mr44438274edu.163.1609205965258; Mon, 28 Dec 2020 17:39:25 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1609205965; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=JJOBR95gZCgrAhQtEDzzBg/54dmL4kHHCDokGapcQS9ikVlZ/7y4AHWJFOAajJdjAB wgW2qOy8mMAKcCAbzVvR/V/JJYyH74VXjjN0YVqpwYqm1pWX9c6CmKzh52rCZCZvZeT9 fnNXeebnm5iIvaO/LF9XEjpFFS3URFCTDullBci1EuAP0y+nM6r8GwskF4pOuZO3Zj+o QDGb6WdPM6L+rfjNfv8uHC+fuPoBVEQaeEcHIZptuMOmTgAcHFz5TOoTcPRvEt7R8sT9 lTWfzm1Usmoa92DHhqil3eTBB6cMc36awxOJBg6jhM7E8+SY2N9MVNfX7XKbcTiWAeDm G91g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=/SIXXjv7Zwf7P89zFg7SzUxIJ6WlXW++AfPsmCL5IBQ=; b=J921wrum6MC3/nHEFoX/tGx6b1xFTYlcjwsjP5fKjEY42Kw2j0B92Zae4ejCkFoSjz P6IvBMi4mHrrhU4yNZQnBIwu+i27DyzqCKBnp2WbV30l+1TB0WKvusAmnctb8cm01jO9 1x74Ai86rDFfUAtWKmM7/jM57XxlZdGbKyDMB9SZrtpNwSxe6w4t8ZNokQ+s6FwxB0bi PsYJ0nFCRe0K2NO5wgjTGOFOnoYhmynMneSssJZeLUHgNaLUhK0+mt8h+Kn3LtkoKNpu d7GOQ5T47O0njNhyCueBMcLfAt8U4MUaNpFhB8rF9W+Gw+UW8KaOLckUx1goOFE8TXPH fOXQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=uZmf5iO1; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id r13si16956343edc.254.2020.12.28.17.39.03; Mon, 28 Dec 2020 17:39:25 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=uZmf5iO1; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729704AbgL1XKU (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 28 Dec 2020 18:10:20 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:60498 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729669AbgL1XKH (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Dec 2020 18:10:07 -0500 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3CC1D2222A; Mon, 28 Dec 2020 23:09:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1609196966; bh=jOEvoLW3+RTZzYx/d5oDDky7OUQiEEge+PGBiZ1lDl0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=uZmf5iO1yf2TrySpwbOfgIiv4OcEnJm6xtNhWAnQmA1AO0GzAsBgLSX4S16hBR1OV eEcCTFcxZn7N8hZd1S/gZghY63/9UzdhWQPdG3o5+iijeVJzHxf0PPdKQQVlzKvOec pEzZYIBhCw/4INT9qpaPo6UW3D7bZ28vC+LUriWcPXDQYasIFRde2LJnxpqRh2zXMd +fbfWuww3+JokXF5vooPMqwm6li9E3pgxHlOXW8ZK9fBbpdE8x7cW6xAl7B47kY9qY S9+RSga7I1pijAr/pcNv6vcqS+oEG6cXk8a26mquOcgHIvg/5yktZH5xdP1nit6SHH 8v1eKJKFvHEkg== Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2020 18:09:25 -0500 From: Sasha Levin To: Andrii Nakryiko Cc: Naresh Kamboju , Greg Kroah-Hartman , open list , linux-stable , Andrii Nakryiko , Alexei Starovoitov Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 106/453] libbpf: Fix BTF data layout checks and allow empty BTF Message-ID: <20201228230925.GH2790422@sasha-vm> References: <20201228124937.240114599@linuxfoundation.org> <20201228124942.316302285@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 11:47:44AM -0800, Andrii Nakryiko wrote: >On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 7:49 AM Naresh Kamboju > wrote: >> >> Perf build failed on stable-rc 5.4 branch due to this patch. >> >> On Mon, 28 Dec 2020 at 19:15, Greg Kroah-Hartman >> wrote: >> > >> > From: Andrii Nakryiko >> > >> > [ Upstream commit d8123624506cd62730c9cd9c7672c698e462703d ] >> > >> > Make data section layout checks stricter, disallowing overlap of types and >> > strings data. >> > >> > Additionally, allow BTFs with no type data. There is nothing inherently wrong >> > with having BTF with no types (put potentially with some strings). This could >> > be a situation with kernel module BTFs, if module doesn't introduce any new >> > type information. >> > >> > Also fix invalid offset alignment check for btf->hdr->type_off. >> > >> > Fixes: 8a138aed4a80 ("bpf: btf: Add BTF support to libbpf") >> > Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko >> > Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov >> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201105043402.2530976-8-andrii@kernel.org >> > Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin >> > --- >> > tools/lib/bpf/btf.c | 16 ++++++---------- >> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) >> > >> > diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c >> > index d606a358480da..3380aadb74655 100644 >> > --- a/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c >> > +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c >> > @@ -100,22 +100,18 @@ static int btf_parse_hdr(struct btf *btf) >> > return -EINVAL; >> > } >> > >> > - if (meta_left < hdr->type_off) { >> > - pr_debug("Invalid BTF type section offset:%u\n", hdr->type_off); >> > + if (meta_left < hdr->str_off + hdr->str_len) { >> > + pr_debug("Invalid BTF total size:%u\n", btf->raw_size); >> >> In file included from btf.c:17:0: >> btf.c: In function 'btf_parse_hdr': >> btf.c:104:48: error: 'struct btf' has no member named 'raw_size'; did >> you mean 'data_size'? >> pr_debug("Invalid BTF total size:%u\n", btf->raw_size); >> ^ >> libbpf_internal.h:59:40: note: in definition of macro '__pr' >> libbpf_print(level, "libbpf: " fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \ >> ^~~~~~~~~~~ >> btf.c:104:3: note: in expansion of macro 'pr_debug' >> pr_debug("Invalid BTF total size:%u\n", btf->raw_size); >> ^~~~~~~~ >> > >This patch fixes the bug introduced back in 8a138aed4a80 ("bpf: btf: >Add BTF support to libbpf"), but a bunch of other refactorings >happened since then, adding/renaming struct btf internals. The fix >here is not that critical, so it's probably best to just drop this >patch from the stable, if possible. Would it be ok, Greg? I'll drop it, thanks. -- Thanks, Sasha