Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:f347:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp9652292pxu; Tue, 29 Dec 2020 00:58:34 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzTKNGKV4Op5FrWFMzSjTjvvvRHsB6t9DXumFMSWWBx6MeZioiOWkeMNKEZzkUDSGetxJUG X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:a415:: with SMTP id l21mr43978520ejz.2.1609232314409; Tue, 29 Dec 2020 00:58:34 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1609232314; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Y98RziitDbG3AR1Ik7dcZtRM3QnOfihT0TNowXDKPLntskr8klxvYIeXK59fdhDfOi oaPsgXbjpA53ezSvm9UuhuPTRLIwA5HHqOLvTLuB9ShgP4octGU9E1Vk8VXpiCx07duG Rmcrkwog3N2G9SjRZp5U2G/6dss4Xvls+c8c4S7PPkgxdLer8Dl4uycY8Q/+ia0g1ccf XjVLGmRQ2q51Vg4ITFkMvqjMIe/jOZe0wJ7f3jHc0hz9z1jsJVsNY6+Xo2XklPLgbajP b9w27BtRLMcSVyyE+k9kV5sAZQM02dwBipTPZU4ETX8ofIgJiA1ymGHspgPG1JKIrqV8 6Uuw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:from:subject:references:mime-version :message-id:in-reply-to:date:sender:dkim-signature; bh=nINvkj7xQmHV3l4zgYQQKWCc+dYml9+Tq+RFchIuJGw=; b=LgGi53kB2fZbuOdklyRpfl0sP6mJO9Wa+XLd2L1oSDsAnRxPgjMtoQ56S0y3CMAVY/ q+41VfxiaUlzWDLyKsMAccurDQ1Ffn0vD+mYqApACx+ol60/a5/2IjnXxxRbXRrm4WPc zfOkaxmmnluTO35SvJsS/ymh1Vdxb8oZ7V/xTfk8X5Nj0RxyngT4rHs9DIVlc7htZ3XF eYqesN1ZF2I0zhHcbUhRSrB+3OwJBqxGmDI/xojOOvKZaRz85ZTrsU66/Rbk3zJqqsxR rp5LHwkcSfwSIofGcuB0nsV0EJTfrBSJ88yrJr4WFEQqNNzM0YT0riZzqOGAtaZHygAF 47aQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=Couj0a2f; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id qh13si19678440ejb.440.2020.12.29.00.58.12; Tue, 29 Dec 2020 00:58:34 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=Couj0a2f; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726323AbgL2I4j (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 29 Dec 2020 03:56:39 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35406 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726114AbgL2I4i (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Dec 2020 03:56:38 -0500 Received: from mail-yb1-xb49.google.com (mail-yb1-xb49.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b49]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41658C06179B for ; Tue, 29 Dec 2020 00:55:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-yb1-xb49.google.com with SMTP id o9so22698651yba.4 for ; Tue, 29 Dec 2020 00:55:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:subject :from:to:cc; bh=nINvkj7xQmHV3l4zgYQQKWCc+dYml9+Tq+RFchIuJGw=; b=Couj0a2fvM+6P4UxIylQWY7zBSiexCetcULpqxUiJFm/DMzaxkocp+7tge08NPHsXA zj2LGTz8s0jIHrJfFihZFw+bncl7iBINQVy3ZikRZKrcETT6LonWTN8xY42qWhilmUaZ KIUKpk8CvMjV0N1YnBFzSYlOewOfnzGZRVO5+UKhxybNZirGshYnVOc0FAizoDj8WM40 OTA1QoPVs4nvNKn4b1xwZO4ylfpldrPcTTkpY4P25sCNj1ylY6QShQfJKyKf5q2rkmXg M3w1WcEgDS3OkizftmIgQY6apYCu2ENwyT2nWZeqzB6ZXs2D9++GfiqNHQt8Qlr/wb+3 CXNQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:from:to:cc; bh=nINvkj7xQmHV3l4zgYQQKWCc+dYml9+Tq+RFchIuJGw=; b=Al5WGiNyQQpZKzi+dRyAcKUqjcaqtTykrOd0pcQweGuI6ijoE4Y/WWNWhjis6ntyoP Dd+/vK9g5ZNqjApUDhva8kriIxlIgcUrjbDHHrcijrVG1fTmcGup54S3e34W0GQWs4gQ HRB9GyR/Z4PiB5dqYOR3etvNZ0rwC0avdy5bWvCdSH0L7u0gtk+s0R1jjWC9NXfPfL22 Ixp/lHFxf9+fDH3zEl6tOZ/D51hPfx+z32jpLbMlg2y5dX5Rgeielrh8FLz9vst+xfMo MhSPpsAtj6E1R4VEbEnDSZkotVRQxfYDVeMPbep7pfnBmr+2Md3mVxMRUwYJajiaduYP 4iiA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532N6i2dL2fZMLJdTDHqBglWVMNRlBT2W5doYpeECmCwE1fhpboc YU6wV5rcWUfLIhvv8qa4IsbWSTDNnOM= Sender: "satyat via sendgmr" X-Received: from satyaprateek.c.googlers.com ([fda3:e722:ac3:10:24:72f4:c0a8:1092]) (user=satyat job=sendgmr) by 2002:a25:bccc:: with SMTP id l12mr69868142ybm.295.1609232131046; Tue, 29 Dec 2020 00:55:31 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2020 08:55:19 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20201229085524.2795331-1-satyat@google.com> Message-Id: <20201229085524.2795331-2-satyat@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20201229085524.2795331-1-satyat@google.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.29.2.729.g45daf8777d-goog Subject: [PATCH v3 1/6] block: keyslot-manager: Introduce passthrough keyslot manager From: Satya Tangirala To: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com Cc: Jens Axboe , Alasdair Kergon , Mike Snitzer , Eric Biggers , Satya Tangirala Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org The device mapper may map over devices that have inline encryption capabilities, and to make use of those capabilities, the DM device must itself advertise those inline encryption capabilities. One way to do this would be to have the DM device set up a keyslot manager with a "sufficiently large" number of keyslots, but that would use a lot of memory. Also, the DM device itself has no "keyslots", and it doesn't make much sense to talk about "programming a key into a DM device's keyslot manager", so all that extra memory used to represent those keyslots is just wasted. All a DM device really needs to be able to do is advertise the crypto capabilities of the underlying devices in a coherent manner and expose a way to evict keys from the underlying devices. There are also devices with inline encryption hardware that do not have a limited number of keyslots. One can send a raw encryption key along with a bio to these devices (as opposed to typical inline encryption hardware that require users to first program a raw encryption key into a keyslot, and send the index of that keyslot along with the bio). These devices also only need the same things from the keyslot manager that DM devices need - a way to advertise crypto capabilities and potentially a way to expose a function to evict keys from hardware. So we introduce a "passthrough" keyslot manager that provides a way to represent a keyslot manager that doesn't have just a limited number of keyslots, and for which do not require keys to be programmed into keyslots. DM devices can set up a passthrough keyslot manager in their request queues, and advertise appropriate crypto capabilities based on those of the underlying devices. Blk-crypto does not attempt to program keys into any keyslots in the passthrough keyslot manager. Instead, if/when the bio is resubmitted to the underlying device, blk-crypto will try to program the key into the underlying device's keyslot manager. Signed-off-by: Satya Tangirala Reviewed-by: Eric Biggers --- block/keyslot-manager.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/linux/keyslot-manager.h | 2 ++ 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+) diff --git a/block/keyslot-manager.c b/block/keyslot-manager.c index 86f8195d8039..ac7ce83a76e8 100644 --- a/block/keyslot-manager.c +++ b/block/keyslot-manager.c @@ -62,6 +62,11 @@ static inline void blk_ksm_hw_exit(struct blk_keyslot_manager *ksm) pm_runtime_put_sync(ksm->dev); } +static inline bool blk_ksm_is_passthrough(struct blk_keyslot_manager *ksm) +{ + return ksm->num_slots == 0; +} + /** * blk_ksm_init() - Initialize a keyslot manager * @ksm: The keyslot_manager to initialize. @@ -205,6 +210,10 @@ blk_status_t blk_ksm_get_slot_for_key(struct blk_keyslot_manager *ksm, int err; *slot_ptr = NULL; + + if (blk_ksm_is_passthrough(ksm)) + return BLK_STS_OK; + down_read(&ksm->lock); slot = blk_ksm_find_and_grab_keyslot(ksm, key); up_read(&ksm->lock); @@ -325,6 +334,16 @@ int blk_ksm_evict_key(struct blk_keyslot_manager *ksm, struct blk_ksm_keyslot *slot; int err = 0; + if (blk_ksm_is_passthrough(ksm)) { + if (ksm->ksm_ll_ops.keyslot_evict) { + blk_ksm_hw_enter(ksm); + err = ksm->ksm_ll_ops.keyslot_evict(ksm, key, -1); + blk_ksm_hw_exit(ksm); + return err; + } + return 0; + } + blk_ksm_hw_enter(ksm); slot = blk_ksm_find_keyslot(ksm, key); if (!slot) @@ -360,6 +379,9 @@ void blk_ksm_reprogram_all_keys(struct blk_keyslot_manager *ksm) { unsigned int slot; + if (blk_ksm_is_passthrough(ksm)) + return; + /* This is for device initialization, so don't resume the device */ down_write(&ksm->lock); for (slot = 0; slot < ksm->num_slots; slot++) { @@ -401,3 +423,20 @@ void blk_ksm_unregister(struct request_queue *q) { q->ksm = NULL; } + +/** + * blk_ksm_init_passthrough() - Init a passthrough keyslot manager + * @ksm: The keyslot manager to init + * + * Initialize a passthrough keyslot manager. + * Called by e.g. storage drivers to set up a keyslot manager in their + * request_queue, when the storage driver wants to manage its keys by itself. + * This is useful for inline encryption hardware that doesn't have the concept + * of keyslots, and for layered devices. + */ +void blk_ksm_init_passthrough(struct blk_keyslot_manager *ksm) +{ + memset(ksm, 0, sizeof(*ksm)); + init_rwsem(&ksm->lock); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blk_ksm_init_passthrough); diff --git a/include/linux/keyslot-manager.h b/include/linux/keyslot-manager.h index 18f3f5346843..323e15dd6fa7 100644 --- a/include/linux/keyslot-manager.h +++ b/include/linux/keyslot-manager.h @@ -103,4 +103,6 @@ void blk_ksm_reprogram_all_keys(struct blk_keyslot_manager *ksm); void blk_ksm_destroy(struct blk_keyslot_manager *ksm); +void blk_ksm_init_passthrough(struct blk_keyslot_manager *ksm); + #endif /* __LINUX_KEYSLOT_MANAGER_H */ -- 2.29.2.729.g45daf8777d-goog