Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030235AbWIGDJG (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Sep 2006 23:09:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751808AbWIGDJF (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Sep 2006 23:09:05 -0400 Received: from e1.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.141]:48359 "EHLO e1.ny.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751807AbWIGDJE (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Sep 2006 23:09:04 -0400 Message-ID: <44FF8D40.2040504@in.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2006 08:38:48 +0530 From: Balbir Singh Reply-To: balbir@in.ibm.com Organization: IBM India Private Limited User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.6) Gecko/20060730 SeaMonkey/1.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: sekharan@us.ibm.com Cc: Rik van Riel , Srivatsa , CKRM-Tech , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Dave Hansen , Andi Kleen , Kirill Korotaev , Christoph Hellwig , Andrey Savochkin , devel@openvz.org, Matt Helsley , Hugh Dickins , Alexey Dobriyan , Oleg Nesterov , Alan Cox , Pavel Emelianov Subject: Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory) References: <44FD918A.7050501@sw.ru> <44FDAB81.5050608@in.ibm.com> <44FEC7E4.7030708@sw.ru> <44FF1EE4.3060005@in.ibm.com> <1157580371.31893.36.camel@linuxchandra> In-Reply-To: <1157580371.31893.36.camel@linuxchandra> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1295 Lines: 40 Chandra Seetharaman wrote: > On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 00:47 +0530, Balbir Singh wrote: > > >> Some not quite so urgent ones - like support for guarantees. I think this can > > IMO, guarantee support should be considered to be part of the > infrastructure. Controller functionalities/implementation will be > different with/without guarantee support. In other words, adding > guarantee feature later will cause re-implementations. Thanks for pointing this out. Thats what I implied in the comment below. > >> be worked out as we make progress. >> >>> I agree with these requirements and lets move into this direction. >>> But moving so far can't be done without accepting: >>> 1. core functionality >>> 2. accounting >>> >> Some of the core functionality might be a limiting factor for the requirements. >> Lets agree on the requirements, I think its a great step forward and then >> build the core functionality with these requirements in mind. >> >>> Thanks, >>> Kirill >>> -- Balbir Singh, Linux Technology Center, IBM Software Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/