Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20201230042208.8997-1-dqfext@gmail.com> <a64312eb-8b4c-d6d4-5624-98f55e33e0b7@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <a64312eb-8b4c-d6d4-5624-98f55e33e0b7@gmail.com>
From:   DENG Qingfang <dqfext@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 30 Dec 2020 17:07:38 +0800
Message-ID: <CALW65jbV-RwbmmiGjfq8P-ZcApOW0YyN6Ez5FvhhP4dgaA+VjQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Registering IRQ for MT7530 internal PHYs
To:     Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Landen Chao <Landen.Chao@mediatek.com>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
        Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
        Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>,
        Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        Weijie Gao <weijie.gao@mediatek.com>,
        Chuanhong Guo <gch981213@gmail.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        =?UTF-8?Q?Ren=C3=A9_van_Dorst?= <opensource@vdorst.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

Hi Heiner,
Thanks for your reply.

On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 3:39 PM Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't think that's the best option.

I'm well aware of that.

> You may want to add a PHY driver for your chip. Supposedly it
> supports at least PHY suspend/resume. You can use the RTL8366RB
> PHY driver as template.

There's no MediaTek PHY driver yet. Do we really need a new one just
for the interrupts?

> > +     dev_info_ratelimited(priv->dev, "interrupt status: 0x%08x\n", val);
> > +     dev_info_ratelimited(priv->dev, "interrupt enable: 0x%08x\n", mt7530_read(priv, MT7530_SYS_INT_EN));
> > +
> This is debug code to be removed in the final version?

Yes.

> > +     for (phy = 0; phy < MT7530_NUM_PHYS; phy++) {
> > +             if (val & BIT(phy)) {
> > +                     unsigned int child_irq;
> > +
> > +                     child_irq = irq_find_mapping(priv->irq_domain, phy);
> > +                     handle_nested_irq(child_irq);
> > +                     handled = true;
> > +             }
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     return handled ? IRQ_HANDLED : IRQ_NONE;
>
> IRQ_RETVAL() could be used here.

Good to know :)

>
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void mt7530_irq_mask(struct irq_data *d)
> > +{
> > +     struct mt7530_priv *priv = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> > +
> > +     priv->irq_enable &= ~BIT(d->hwirq);
>
> Here you don't actually do something. HW doesn't support masking
> interrupt generation for a port?

priv->irq_enable will be written to MT7530_SYS_INT_EN in
mt7530_irq_bus_sync_unlock. You can think of it as an inverted mask.