Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751760AbWIGMdx (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Sep 2006 08:33:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751763AbWIGMdx (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Sep 2006 08:33:53 -0400 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:428 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751760AbWIGMdw (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Sep 2006 08:33:52 -0400 Subject: Re: question regarding cacheline size From: Arjan van de Ven To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: Tejun Heo , linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, Greg KH , lkml In-Reply-To: <20060907122311.GM2558@parisc-linux.org> References: <44FFD8C6.8080802@gmail.com> <20060907111120.GL2558@parisc-linux.org> <45000076.4070005@gmail.com> <20060907120756.GA29532@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20060907122311.GM2558@parisc-linux.org> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Intel International BV Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2006 14:33:25 +0200 Message-Id: <1157632405.14882.27.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-2.fc4) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 513 Lines: 17 > > So I think we should redo the PCI subsystem to set cacheline size during > the buswalk rather than waiting for drivers to ask for it to be set. ... while allowing for quirks for devices that go puke when this register gets written ;) (afaik there are a few) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/