Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751815AbWIGNNM (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Sep 2006 09:13:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751812AbWIGNNM (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Sep 2006 09:13:12 -0400 Received: from coyote.holtmann.net ([217.160.111.169]:746 "EHLO mail.holtmann.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751811AbWIGNNL (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Sep 2006 09:13:11 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] request_firmware examples and MODULE_FIRMWARE From: Marcel Holtmann To: Jon Masters Cc: Victor Hugo , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Victor Castro In-Reply-To: <1157560971.5265.94.camel@perihelion> References: <1157441620.24916.5.camel@localhost> <508B6A67-CA5B-4A81-B868-BF8A03D78888@vhugo.net> <1157560971.5265.94.camel@perihelion> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2006 17:10:26 +0200 Message-Id: <1157641826.30159.99.camel@aeonflux.holtmann.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1647 Lines: 36 Hi Jon, > > > actually it has never been really a filename. It was a simple pattern > > > that the initial hotplug script and later the udev script mapped > > > 1:1 to a filename on your filesystem. If you check the mailing list > > > archives of LKML and linux-hotplug you will see that I always resisted > > > in allowing drivers to include a directory path in that call. A couple > > > of people tried this and it is not what it was meant to be. > > That's fine. I agree with the idea - *but* it strikes me that we don't > really have a co-ordinated database of what module "patterns" map to > what on-disk firmware, aside from hotplug/udev scripts. We need to > co-ordinate this stuff a lot more. Or am I missing something? I'm happy > to setup a database on the kerneltools.org wiki if that's useful... that is true, but it is actually not a problem of the kernel and your proposed MODULE_FIRMWARE patch. However it might be a good idea to start something like this. It will also help to see what is actually needed. > I'm trying to avoid the need to have lots of different places in > userland needing to track firmware versioning. But on some level, I just > need to know that a given driver is going to ask for 1 firmware with the > ID of "foo" - and a way to extrapolate where it is on disk to package. Let start collecting these information and then go from there. Regards Marcel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/