Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Thu, 31 Dec 2020 12:18:03 +0000
From:   Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To:     Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc:     Alexander Dahl <post@lespocky.de>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Alexander Dahl <ada@thorsis.com>, linux-leds@vger.kernel.org,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
        linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, Jeff LaBundy <jeff@labundy.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/4] dt-bindings: mfd: Fix schema warnings for pwm-leds
Message-ID: <20201231121803.GC4413@dell>
References: <20201228163217.32520-1-post@lespocky.de>
 <20201228163217.32520-2-post@lespocky.de>
 <20201230185439.GC25903@duo.ucw.cz>
 <20201231083317.GB4413@dell>
 <20201231093945.GA22962@amd>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20201231093945.GA22962@amd>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 31 Dec 2020, Pavel Machek wrote:

> Hi!
> 
> > > > The node names for devices using the pwm-leds driver follow a certain
> > > > naming scheme (now).  Parent node name is not enforced, but recommended
> > > > by DT project.
> > > > 
> > > >   DTC     Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.example.dt.yaml
> > > >   CHECK   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.example.dt.yaml
> > > > /home/alex/build/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.example.dt.yaml: pwmleds: 'panel' does not match any of the regexes: '^led(-[0-9a-f]+)?$', 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
> > > >         From schema: /home/alex/src/linux/leds/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-pwm.yaml
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Dahl <post@lespocky.de>
> > > > Acked-by: Jeff LaBundy <jeff@labundy.com>
> > > > Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> > > 
> > > Thanks, applied.
> > 
> > Sorry, what?
> > 
> > Applied to what tree?
> 
> I took it to (local copy) of leds-next tree on. But now I realised it
> is mfd, not a LED patch, so I undone that. Sorry for the confusion.
> 
> Anyway, patch still looks good to me:
> 
> Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>

Thanks Pavel.

I plan on taking this next week.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog