Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751781AbWIGOvU (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Sep 2006 10:51:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751783AbWIGOvU (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Sep 2006 10:51:20 -0400 Received: from 85.8.24.16.se.wasadata.net ([85.8.24.16]:64395 "EHLO smtp.drzeus.cx") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751781AbWIGOvT (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Sep 2006 10:51:19 -0400 Message-ID: <450031E6.7010603@drzeus.cx> Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2006 16:51:18 +0200 From: Pierre Ossman User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060803) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [MMC] Fix SD timeout calculation References: <20060618123432.15915.71389.stgit@poseidon.drzeus.cx> <20060907125840.GA6015@dyn-67.arm.linux.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20060907125840.GA6015@dyn-67.arm.linux.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 770 Lines: 21 Russell King wrote: > On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 02:34:37PM +0200, Pierre Ossman wrote: >> Secure Digital cards use a different algorithm to calculate the timeout >> for data transfers. Using the MMC one works often, but not always. > > Applied, thanks. > > I'm wondering about this cleanup though - both the timeout calculations > appear to be identical, so making this a library function seems to be > the right way to go... unless you know different? > Shouldn't be a problem. Acked-by: Pierre Ossman - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/