Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:f347:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp12349731pxu; Fri, 1 Jan 2021 18:30:18 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxM4ytXtkT+OMjAMNY4i7Tmm0sr4SMec+d/P2YQm54po36RXStqENzX6ruVBt774iyXlE0x X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:76c9:: with SMTP id q9mr8711353ejn.484.1609554618340; Fri, 01 Jan 2021 18:30:18 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1609554618; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=bxP71KiLTq6lDDSqNfxBLtMhZIQdXa29p5zY/EJ34/SvRC3JYc1KTjnd6WcGg4XSVH AiBJ1yt/rfh5Jse66zYf8TmF2PT54pmJfGR9wda/cTI8nqwcCHlRV2OMUyZwXhoDveFd alvwY1vJSr/Zr0ML4Uar/+S36JP8mhk18wOa9oy0lJ8tGinoYIgDJKm503KN1dx9YV4E RsOg/42uhXY1CMlW/MNaTvpPgqjCg59ALw+A8EjKk3OwSHeoIpmw5dnfYYFBIbiNiHU0 /QaEPL74i1tDCodZr0HS+MXBY/SdHyZFgrAPjesIUw5MNA0/nlZmFgQa8N65BJzUEyqu h3Gg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:message-id:subject:to:from:date :content-transfer-encoding:dkim-signature:mime-version; bh=1mq6RTHf3VrOuIYqLH/zTEJtV8b8eTejqpxx6SndT0A=; b=aMv9iuNInD7qHgV79/40++5i+5+9li6ooiIT/0aJRBZRoLnj6tJ693Q1H6yjvcexu6 CIRLUX7le2jOHAn5rtVaGul+kjlwIKnJZ76xvhnYDWT3g5+zLdriZ0yMEBKM1/rrvlyB 0jUuYFXNQ5zrL6w6lKVR66NTB4/2vUyj8keT5d9zG+RXW1SZWzPUk817spOjDIqj0yDv KrHlrJAj+tHhPB8Ecs9McSeM+fbtGwvQBBL/KiK16TxXkNQoZ0cJsu7KvTVrG5NTS92P iIG7TSoJejFZdMu3wFe8qPuvya8ZEFKpHl0/6ZoAQ7gfQ+7hbthDQJiUURUJcsNv3uy3 0zFw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@firemail.cc header.s=mail header.b=Zl9xxRrQ; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 88si27862105edr.151.2021.01.01.18.29.23; Fri, 01 Jan 2021 18:30:18 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@firemail.cc header.s=mail header.b=Zl9xxRrQ; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727186AbhABC2C (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 1 Jan 2021 21:28:02 -0500 Received: from mail.cock.li ([37.120.193.124]:43090 "EHLO mail.cock.li" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726424AbhABC2C (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Jan 2021 21:28:02 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=firemail.cc; s=mail; t=1609554432; bh=9K4nt2O021ZCKYcp0ZKGhthprKTmYgkqicaMKo0bXDo=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=Zl9xxRrQABrrGxEUR5V7gud2f5W1ZajVB5AmV3xiJihONnWny0Bj1NuGcZKQN85JH Ou4Y35BUiIcWZmdPA1aeea1MICRJcHyLvTMop7YZ+alV9/LzXR4Thqu88ByMCTxwJA Z34EBdfK4ypdlAVZ5sELjZhRlD5IAnrz2zT958QU7kNk50FYWnYnQpM548hgsBJz7g 0/wVgZYzwSLpaf6xKM+5j7rjzUYZRu48r6GgijotPB0KlRrIDa+87gKI9rRMCHxXgL HHIYQc5ToRXaqHP8kRslGL32pG+vWSaQY/iPBGKc2TbT2v4L8Tr0mtPrDHtyg/XUA5 mlQUsi1vou/DQ== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sat, 02 Jan 2021 02:27:13 +0000 From: nipponmail@firemail.cc To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Grsecurity GPL Violations: Bring a CASE act claim every time GrSecurity releases a new infringing work? Message-ID: <59d0dfe831bbdbe68cc113c6fd225752@firemail.cc> X-Sender: nipponmail@firemail.cc User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.3.15 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Should each Linux copyright owner of whom's copyright is being violated (By GrSecurity) bring a "small claims copyright" case every time GrSecurity sends a new infringing patch to a customer? (GRSecurity blatantly violates the clause in the Linux kernel and GCC copyright licenses regarding adding addtional terms between the licensee of the kernel / gcc and furthur down-the-line licensees, regarding derivative works) (The linux kernel has 1000s of copyright holders) (All who shake at the knees at the thought of initiating a federal Copyright lawsuit) (GrSecurity's main Programmer: Brad Spengler: has shining resplendent blue eyes; like sapphires, however) > https://www.billboard.com/articles/business/9503848/congress-case-copyright-reforms-covid-19-relief-bill/ >The CASE Act creates a new small claims system in the US that allows copyright holders to pursue damages for copyright infringement without filing a federal lawsuit. These claims would be decided by copyright officers, not judges and juries, and could involve no more than $15,000 per work infringed upon, and $30,000 total Does this new law create broader per-violation rights for the copyright holder? The then current copyright law makes it quite hard to go after violators: usually the lawsuit costs more than any hope of recovery. Every version you want to sue over, if you actually want to recover attorneys fees and statutory damages (not just whatever revenue you can proove (good luck)), has to be registered with the copyright office; same or similar violations subsequent to a registration by the same violator DO NOT grant you Attorney's fees and Statutory recovery; the same of a later version doesn't either. It's hard to get any money out of a violator. Especially how Free Software and Opensource copyright holders do things... (never registering their copyrights seemingly, always afraid, cowering before CoC's, being servants and slaves, doing it all for free, being kicked out of their own "societies)