Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 13/15] acpi: Add acpi_dev_get_next_match_dev() and
 helper macro
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-media@vger.kernel.org, devel@acpica.org,
        gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
        sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com, mchehab@kernel.org, lenb@kernel.org,
        yong.zhi@intel.com, sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com,
        bingbu.cao@intel.com, tian.shu.qiu@intel.com,
        robert.moore@intel.com, erik.kaneda@intel.com, pmladek@suse.com,
        rostedt@goodmis.org, linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk,
        laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com,
        jacopo+renesas@jmondi.org, kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com,
        hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl, m.felsch@pengutronix.de,
        niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se, slongerbeam@gmail.com,
        heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com, linus.walleij@linaro.org
References: <20210103231235.792999-1-djrscally@gmail.com>
 <20210103231235.792999-14-djrscally@gmail.com>
 <20210104124228.GU4077@smile.fi.intel.com>
From:   Daniel Scally <djrscally@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <589d7078-60e6-ae2b-dbb2-bbe5b8ef7775@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 4 Jan 2021 12:57:34 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20210104124228.GU4077@smile.fi.intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Precedence: bulk

On 04/01/2021 12:42, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 03, 2021 at 11:12:33PM +0000, Daniel Scally wrote:
>> To ensure we handle situations in which multiple sensors of the same
>> model (and therefore _HID) are present in a system, we need to be able
>> to iterate over devices matching a known _HID but unknown _UID and _HRV
>>  - add acpi_dev_get_next_match_dev() to accommodate that possibility and
>> change acpi_dev_get_first_match_dev() to simply call the new function
>> with a NULL starting point. Add an iterator macro for convenience.
> I guess we need Rafael's blessing on this.
For this one yes