Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751883AbWIGVGY (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Sep 2006 17:06:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751882AbWIGVGX (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Sep 2006 17:06:23 -0400 Received: from smarthost1.sentex.ca ([64.7.153.18]:15818 "EHLO smarthost1.sentex.ca") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751880AbWIGVGV (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Sep 2006 17:06:21 -0400 From: "Stuart MacDonald" To: "'Chase Venters'" Cc: "'Krzysztof Halasa'" , , "'Willy Tarreau'" , Subject: RE: bogofilter ate 3/5 Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 17:05:53 -0400 Organization: Connect Tech Inc. Message-ID: <08ec01c6d2c1$67e43d10$294b82ce@stuartm> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Importance: Normal Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1530 Lines: 42 From: Chase Venters [mailto:chase.venters@clientec.com] > What are you implying - that SpamCop doesn't make decisions > about who to > block and who to not block for third parties? Their weasel wording It's not an implication, it's a fact. > I will strongly criticize any service that purports to label > senders of > automatic responses as senders of unsolicited mail. The What would you call it then when I receive a bounce/etc that is in reponse to a message someone else sent? I certainly never solicited that. Perhaps you could send me your snail mail address; I'll solicit some junk mail but put your address down. But don't call it junk mail when you receive it, because it was solicited! > And on the specific issue of autoresponders, I think a reasonable > compromise is to support DomainKeys. That way if a sender is > irritated > that they are receiving automatic responses from messages they didn't > send, they can personally take action to invalidate the forgery. IMO one should never have to receive "automatic responses from messages they didn't send". > But mark my words: Asking hosts to stop sending bounce messages or > automatic responses is insane and contrary to over a decade > of established > postmaster precedent. Things change. ..Stu - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/