Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20210103231235.792999-1-djrscally@gmail.com> <20210103231235.792999-16-djrscally@gmail.com>
 <20210104120905.GR4077@smile.fi.intel.com> <2f64873d-0413-3614-34e2-139b4a4d9da6@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <2f64873d-0413-3614-34e2-139b4a4d9da6@gmail.com>
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 4 Jan 2021 15:38:47 +0200
Message-ID: <CAHp75VcU7DcRZD_eK+B1-CX7tVtsR5YLPdrA6oULk187xhApCw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 15/15] ipu3-cio2: Add cio2-bridge to ipu3-cio2 driver
To:     Daniel Scally <djrscally@gmail.com>, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
        devel@acpica.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
        Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Yong Zhi <yong.zhi@intel.com>,
        Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
        Bingbu Cao <bingbu.cao@intel.com>,
        Tian Shu Qiu <tian.shu.qiu@intel.com>,
        Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>,
        Erik Kaneda <erik.kaneda@intel.com>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
        Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>,
        Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@jmondi.org>,
        kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com,
        Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl>,
        Marco Felsch <m.felsch@pengutronix.de>,
        niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se,
        Steve Longerbeam <slongerbeam@gmail.com>,
        "Krogerus, Heikki" <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        Jordan Hand <jorhand@linux.microsoft.com>,
        Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 3:02 PM Daniel Scally <djrscally@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 04/01/2021 12:09, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 03, 2021 at 11:12:35PM +0000, Daniel Scally wrote:

...

> >> +#define NODE_SENSOR(_HID, _PROPS)           \
> >> +    ((const struct software_node) {         \
> >> +            .name = _HID,                   \
> >> +            .properties = _PROPS,           \
> >> +    })
> >> +
> >> +#define NODE_PORT(_PORT, _SENSOR_NODE)              \
> >> +    ((const struct software_node) {         \
> >> +            .name = _PORT,                  \
> >> +            .parent = _SENSOR_NODE,         \
> >> +    })
> >> +
> >> +#define NODE_ENDPOINT(_EP, _PORT, _PROPS)   \
> >> +    ((const struct software_node) {         \
> >> +            .name = _EP,                    \
> >> +            .parent = _PORT,                \
> >> +            .properties = _PROPS,           \
> >> +    })
> > In all three I didn't get why you need outer parentheses. Without them it will
> > be well defined compound literal and should work as is.
> The code works fine, but checkpatch complains that macros with complex
> values should be enclosed in parentheses. I guess now that I'm more
> familiar with the code I'd call that a false-positive though, as nowhere
> else in the kernel that I've seen encloses them the same way.

I guess it is yet another false positive from checkpatch.
I would ignore its complaints.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko