Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
From:   Stephen Berman <stephen.berman@gmx.net>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc:     Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
        Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
        Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>,
        Erik Kaneda <erik.kaneda@intel.com>,
        Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
        "open list:ACPI COMPONENT ARCHITECTURE (ACPICA)" <devel@acpica.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: power-off delay/hang due to commit 6d25be57 (mainline)
References: <87blkbx1gt.fsf@gmx.net>
        <CAJZ5v0j86pX_a4bSLP=sobLoYhfQYV9dWL8HHf2941kXgND79g@mail.gmail.com>
        <CAJZ5v0j7i86twMS+csYMaetUkvqjof4FD2GRNoZ_AN=SBF7F1w@mail.gmail.com>
        <9709109.MH8tSaV5v9@kreacher>
Date:   Mon, 04 Jan 2021 16:38:43 +0100
In-Reply-To: <9709109.MH8tSaV5v9@kreacher> (Rafael J. Wysocki's message of
        "Thu, 31 Dec 2020 21:46:11 +0100")
Message-ID: <87eej0iuf0.fsf@gmx.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 31 Dec 2020 21:46:11 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote:

> ATM, I'm tempted to do something like the patch below (with the rationale
> that it shouldn't be necessary to read the temperature right after updating
> the trip points if polling is in use, because the next update through polling
> will cause it to be read anyway and it will trigger trip point actions as
> needed).
>
> Stephen, can you give it a go, please?

On Sat, 02 Jan 2021 12:03:17 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote:

> There is one more way to address this, probably better: instead of checking the
> temperature right away in acpi_thermal_notify(), queue that on acpi_thermal_pm_queue
> and so only if another thermal check is not pending.
>
> This way there will be at most one temperature check coming from
> acpi_thermal_notify() queued up at any time which should prevent the
> build-up of work items from taking place.
>
> So something like this:

Thanks for the patches.  I'll try them as soon as I can.

Steve Berman