Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
From:   David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Introduce PRU remoteproc consumer API
To:     grzegorz.jaszczyk@linaro.org
Cc:     bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        lee.jones@linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, mathieu.poirier@linaro.org,
        ohad@wizery.com, praneeth@ti.com, robh+dt@kernel.org,
        rogerq@ti.com, s-anna@ti.com, ssantosh@kernel.org, t-kristo@ti.com
References: <20201216165239.2744-1-grzegorz.jaszczyk@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <9603a894-495b-3c73-0916-aea52f98fe9f@lechnology.com>
Date:   Mon, 4 Jan 2021 14:11:50 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20201216165239.2744-1-grzegorz.jaszczyk@linaro.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk


> Please see the individual patches for exact changes in each patch, following is
> the only change from v1:
>  - Change the 'prus' property name to 'ti,prus' as suggested by Rob Herring,
>  which influences patch #1 and patch #2

It looks like "soc: ti: pruss: Add pruss_{request, release}_mem_region() API"
was also dropped in v2. Was this intentional?