Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20201230145708.28544-1-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
 <20201230145708.28544-3-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
 <CAMuHMdVCD52-eTnEwftGz8ExMkZkJRyM=3M8zU11yhn1UNPxxA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+V-a8tHVkGxCECspfcV9c1UW81bod4N4YzRLJwU8zJ0+awJUw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20210104213005.GK5645@sirena.org.uk> <20210104234018.GA19909@amd>
 <CAMuHMdUjevJ+DgJGnPUN0+ctxm2ML1NYSTgYsjC4c8tDqjUkxQ@mail.gmail.com> <20210105104234.GA29908@amd>
In-Reply-To: <20210105104234.GA29908@amd>
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Date:   Tue, 5 Jan 2021 12:11:31 +0100
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdXOD_vGOYKHS+gVP+RBf_R3tmN2y0SvnphO56kvAiyM-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] spi: rpc-if: Remove CONFIG_PM_SLEEP ifdefery
To:     Pavel Machek <pavel@denx.de>
Cc:     Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
        "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>,
        Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>,
        Jiri Kosina <trivial@kernel.org>,
        Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@gmail.com>,
        linux-spi <linux-spi@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
        Chris Brandt <Chris.Brandt@renesas.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

Hi Pavel,

On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 11:42 AM Pavel Machek <pavel@denx.de> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 12:40 AM Pavel Machek <pavel@denx.de> wrote:
> > > > > > >                 .name   = "rpc-if-spi",
> > > > > > > -               .pm     = DEV_PM_OPS,
> > > > > > > +               .pm     = &rpcif_spi_pm_ops,
> > > >
> > > > > > You're aware rpcif_spi_pm_ops is now always referenced and thus emitted,
> > > > > > increasing kernel size by 92 bytes if CONFIG_PM_SLEEP=n?
> > > > > > This may matter for RZ/A SoCs running from internal SRAM.
> > > >
> > > > > Hmm didn't realise this would be an issue on RZ/A.
> > > >
> > > > > Mark, could you please drop this patch from your branch.
> > > >
> > > > Please send an incremental patch with an appropriate changelog.
> > >
> > > Let's fix this properly. I'm pretty sure we have some macros that can
> > > solve this without re-introducing the ifdefs...
> >
> > There's pm_ptr(), but it uses CONFIG_PM as a selector, not CONFIG_PM_SLEEP.
>
> Okay; so we could introduce pm_sleep_ptr().
>
> Or we could just put single #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP around the .pm
> assignment? That would be improvement on the original, and still
> result in the same binary, right?

Indeed.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds