Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:f347:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp347504pxu; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 12:40:58 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxIXVcvDDXXCQdhwvsuIeFlPBmWU27xtsdDWHCOD4NZLCEixk12JbDyZl3eyACWW1gSGMD8 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:710b:: with SMTP id x11mr771758ejj.433.1609879258660; Tue, 05 Jan 2021 12:40:58 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1609879258; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Iu5ckkFmkqrBkfqYxiTt/NqogNP+Dchgs7tPwmg/gBssC0hlnYG+yHikEqJsq8PdMu SwLCHZttleDhnDmdpyZjIxyM/nhUpN/8IakhRaLLrxnEyUuFlURgAbgWpDpMby9czYU6 n1s89C/RoauElv0+Bm/iifqO4jcnQ6vAAscmbxiVgzuu+FMUKbgBt0/RNVmRNR2n2PXI hzzgUWIl5GMLouxeJSeDuFMjfhDW0MNIu88y0zK5nKja8pVDlkp82zOzMmO6CQ4/9eAN a5zqPjg/9krPAfHD7woAOTzRmy7gYRuXiV39RxI2udGe8Ibni3xIYE497IYh1FOKToYh WuEg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:dkim-signature; bh=85pKVnvSeYA5QLQD5EhADjq2rId3Mid5CE6/9bUvHYM=; b=qvieALGguP1qqzIlAn2/VS0SkgbD/5oQSCirpAFqpnbhpK7pBOuSFi38xht1Y1+k8x jwU7yQy6cb8hMu3hukoh3iQbSxN3st1WVbL353ootmLTdDUgi82Zr/zL4WOfor8N/zij qBEOcFTLjGPr00tsFK5H4Cj8LnvwMtntBiCm/nyiVwEr9FawYp7AteeuXilNm2cBW/+v vkI6gj+Jxehh0+7Tm0Zv38rRMpoDNytXq00JvyRl6oHmjnj9o0y0hsE/CQ9Kp9GiDPBo 2SUCUNFw8nCm8VFKERMJv4A5GKCDIMB+URwivqk5h4mACUqjsyh7RR8hswbwh63oWC4Q graw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=fjUIk+tG; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id gj15si109969ejb.597.2021.01.05.12.40.35; Tue, 05 Jan 2021 12:40:58 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=fjUIk+tG; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729825AbhAENHl (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 5 Jan 2021 08:07:41 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:55758 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729176AbhAENHk (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jan 2021 08:07:40 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1609851973; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=85pKVnvSeYA5QLQD5EhADjq2rId3Mid5CE6/9bUvHYM=; b=fjUIk+tGp/ui2/U5U3g4JLTnl7eRfFj1KpkrOBITODmwDs/gGcocJvJfNu6PdSYsOpq4vD 57JzmG8m8h53DcjqzhqfNif9TWmoa1ypn8hZTTQ/hRKPxEKfn6Kr9XdEnyCEwEvK5APcVi 033oW51nW0ES2lqE+bdyuKbxupgM0BE= Received: from mail-ej1-f72.google.com (mail-ej1-f72.google.com [209.85.218.72]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-215-Q8pAyullO5mQCud3qURWpw-1; Tue, 05 Jan 2021 08:06:11 -0500 X-MC-Unique: Q8pAyullO5mQCud3qURWpw-1 Received: by mail-ej1-f72.google.com with SMTP id pv24so7921042ejb.19 for ; Tue, 05 Jan 2021 05:06:11 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=85pKVnvSeYA5QLQD5EhADjq2rId3Mid5CE6/9bUvHYM=; b=Q9mFhWtAlxPbC3M26fg4dQW4NICm6Vd1a14zu6k0ykdgpgRypA5m3AevlK2y27niJL s8RlUXRqwqdArRaR4PorN6yk3U9Tenu8MZ2JuNf+43YTWTg5mID+Javtc9YDI2fJF5my 1bjiVWSlxmh9HXD5bvJ6cv5gmfBX+/JaWkj2UTMuwgs9kpZz86GkMfjflRmOBoVONupO 1Bn5atNcpXNTqgUEYHRgrd0mKX+N8wVlkPGOOQboFUB9E6n1CRQBV1aPXI+aYOFR+J5b PNV2ZZHWn+Tcp4oZ6QAgS9TEcnF6ThieMAznQ4sBFVed8UjpcwtaIq7yuPCiEv0EuGUv so3A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533ezkmDwSD+9PYyW8iaxaY7ALb0dOPc1QxqY+7n2tXto5s4gQ1s xzOzUGi6UHoWWAbuDZyzL4H+14AJCyI51faKAlqx6ZpASfjGw6QbdM3HEpmBEFdKzGHslba/Y/9 Y1KLb4dj24LIziYy/U5EXWC0u X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:3192:: with SMTP id di18mr74257299edb.332.1609851970497; Tue, 05 Jan 2021 05:06:10 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:3192:: with SMTP id di18mr74257264edb.332.1609851970322; Tue, 05 Jan 2021 05:06:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from vitty.brq.redhat.com (g-server-2.ign.cz. [91.219.240.2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p12sm22637661eds.39.2021.01.05.05.06.09 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 05 Jan 2021 05:06:09 -0800 (PST) From: Vitaly Kuznetsov To: Alexey Makhalov Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, hpa@zytor.com, bp@alien8.de, mingo@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de, pv-drivers@vmware.com, sdeep@vmware.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/vmware: avoid TSC recalibration In-Reply-To: <20210105004752.131069-1-amakhalov@vmware.com> References: <20210105004752.131069-1-amakhalov@vmware.com> Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2021 14:06:08 +0100 Message-ID: <87im8bildr.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Alexey Makhalov writes: > When TSC frequency is known (retrieved from hypervisor), we should skip > TSC refined calibration by setting X86_FEATURE_TSC_KNOWN_FREQ. > > Signed-off-by: Alexey Makhalov > --- > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/vmware.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/vmware.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/vmware.c > index c6ede3b3d302..83164110ccc5 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/vmware.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/vmware.c > @@ -378,6 +378,8 @@ static void __init vmware_set_capabilities(void) > { > setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC); > setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_TSC_RELIABLE); > + if (vmware_tsc_khz) > + setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_TSC_KNOWN_FREQ); > if (vmware_hypercall_mode == CPUID_VMWARE_FEATURES_ECX_VMCALL) > setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_VMCALL); > else if (vmware_hypercall_mode == CPUID_VMWARE_FEATURES_ECX_VMMCALL) The same trick is being used in Xen/Jailhouse/KVM code already and Hyper-V overwrites x86_platform.calibrate_tsc/x86_platform.calibrate_cpu hooks to basically achive the same goal. Should we maybe introduce a flag in 'struct hypervisor_x86' or something like that to unify all this? Just a suggestion. -- Vitaly