Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 5 Jan 2021 14:01:28 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To:     Jim Quinlan <jim2101024@gmail.com>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
        Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com>,
        linux-pci <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
        Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>,
        bcm-kernel-feedback-list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
        "moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE" 
        <linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        "moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] dt-bindings: PCI: Add bindings for Brcmstb EP
 voltage regulators
Message-ID: <20210105140128.GC4487@sirena.org.uk>
References: <20201130211145.3012-1-james.quinlan@broadcom.com>
 <20201130211145.3012-2-james.quinlan@broadcom.com>
 <20201209140122.GA331678@robh.at.kernel.org>
 <CANCKTBsFALwF8Hy-=orH8D-nd-qyXqFDopATmKCvbqPbUTC7Sw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="GPJrCs/72TxItFYR"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CANCKTBsFALwF8Hy-=orH8D-nd-qyXqFDopATmKCvbqPbUTC7Sw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Precedence: bulk


--GPJrCs/72TxItFYR
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Mon, Jan 04, 2021 at 05:12:11PM -0500, Jim Quinlan wrote:

> For us, the supplies are for the EP chip's power.  We have the PCIe
> controller turning them "on" for power-on/resume and "off" for
> power-off/suspend.  We need the "xxx-supply" property in the
> controller's DT node because of the chicken-and-egg situation: if the
> property was in the EP's DT node, the RC  will never discover the EP
> to see that there is a regulator to turn on.   We would be happy with
> a single supply name, something like "ep-power".  We would be ecstatic
> to have two (ep0-power, ep1-power).

Why can't the controller look at the nodes describing devices for
standard properties?

--GPJrCs/72TxItFYR
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAl/0cTcACgkQJNaLcl1U
h9DIbwf+NHMTbyBOhHAFuUOWo4I6SmPq9+RsD3YDgS59K1pPy618QRiBt/+c2TSw
lV5lD8CiHXjlbVytAV+iw2xwmzsRI78YTuYz4o0GwKp2bKz23NQbGaCd8KN5oIEA
ToNd53+zPtoRXHP61UC3DOJbDHVdAmYo7vHWh+VFrwl4V2Z/97MokfQ1CL6uIdRh
NMwgaP2Hw8v6spI4q9rdpqEbzSaik7OkuNpFzDRRN2d/fB+NFv561M+lDAN7Ukyk
CZbPC5l01SLY2dO6JugfEvf9lduKTU+QCfIQ2+BVOPA1C5r7Idrbg/s+ZSEoaX3L
kGbxqKu3ifqx3n4xjDya93k/Ftrt/Q==
=cqQe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--GPJrCs/72TxItFYR--