Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750709AbWIHQzq (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Sep 2006 12:55:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750721AbWIHQzq (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Sep 2006 12:55:46 -0400 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:5282 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750709AbWIHQzp (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Sep 2006 12:55:45 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.18-rc5] PCI: sort device lists breadth-first From: Arjan van de Ven To: Matt Domsch Cc: Dave Jones , linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, Greg KH , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20060908161817.GA12642@lists.us.dell.com> References: <20060908031422.GA4549@lists.us.dell.com> <20060908155639.GJ28592@redhat.com> <20060908161817.GA12642@lists.us.dell.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Intel International BV Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2006 18:55:16 +0200 Message-Id: <1157734517.30730.103.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-2.fc4) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2711 Lines: 57 On Fri, 2006-09-08 at 11:18 -0500, Matt Domsch wrote: > On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 11:56:39AM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 10:14:22PM -0500, Matt Domsch wrote: > > > Problem: > > > New Dell PowerEdge servers have 2 embedded ethernet ports, which are > > > labeled NIC1 and NIC2 on the chassis, in the BIOS setup screens, and > > > in the printed documentation. Assuming no other add-in ethernet ports > > > in the system, Linux 2.4 kernels name these eth0 and eth1 > > > respectively. Many people have come to expect this naming. Linux 2.6 > > > kernels name these eth1 and eth0 respectively (backwards from > > > expectations). I also have reports that various Sun and HP servers > > > have similar behavior. > > > > This came up years back when 2.6 was something new, and the answer > > then was 'bind the interface to the MAC address'. > > Both Red Hat-based distros and openSuSE-based distros do something > like this with configuration files automatically. Red Hat's > anaconda/kudzu puts the HWADDR lines in the generated > /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-* files. openSuSE's udev rules > puts lines in /etc/udev/rules.d/30-net_persistent_names.rules the > first time it discovers a new interface. Both methods are intended to > maintain a persistent name for each NIC, after being set up the first > time. Neither deals well with replacing one NIC with another - you > must edit the config files. > > This works pretty well post-install. It doesn't work well at install > time, all the installers use the kernel's original names, and then > those names become the persistent names in the config files. > > > > Whilst your patch will fix the case that's currently broken (2.4->2.6), > > doesn't it offer equal possibility to break existing setups when people move > > from <=2.6.18 -> 2.6.19 ? > > If they're using config files / udev rules as suggested, it shouldn't > break them. > > If they're not, then yes, this could. Debian's > /etc/network/interfaces file allows use of hwaddr fields, though by > default it doesn't appear anything sets it up. > > I'm open to suggestions on how *not* to break setups that don't use > the MAC addresses. to be honest I really don't like the PCI ordering change thing for this. It's just too fragile altogether to cause a fixed ordering as you want. Maybe the kernel's initial ordering should do a numeric sort by mac address or something.. (or userspace should) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/