Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <cover.1608963094.git.syednwaris@gmail.com> <CACRpkdYZwMy5faNhUyiNnvdnMOf4ac7XWqjnf3f4jCJeE=p2Lw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMpxmJW46Oh2h7RrBNo5vACfYnWy63rZOO=Va=ppUDeaj5GpBg@mail.gmail.com> <20210105143921.GL4077@smile.fi.intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <20210105143921.GL4077@smile.fi.intel.com>
From:   Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Date:   Wed, 6 Jan 2021 08:27:43 +0100
Message-ID: <CAMpxmJXX5tPBvHRBkgCBK22vUc_FOo2ENUagqOF-opzakkyjrA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Introduce the for_each_set_clump macro
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        Syed Nayyar Waris <syednwaris@gmail.com>,
        William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@gmail.com>,
        Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Robert Richter <rrichter@marvell.com>,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
        "(Exiting) Amit Kucheria" <amit.kucheria@verdurent.com>,
        Linux-Arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 3:38 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 03:19:13PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 27, 2020 at 10:27 PM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, Dec 26, 2020 at 7:41 AM Syed Nayyar Waris <syednwaris@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Since this patchset primarily affects GPIO drivers, would you like
> > > > to pick it up through your GPIO tree?
> > >
> > > Actually Bartosz is handling the GPIO patches for v5.12.
> > > I tried to merge the patch series before but failed for
> > > various reasons.
>
> > My info on this is a bit outdated - didn't Linus Torvalds reject these
> > patches from Andrew Morton's PR? Or am I confusing this series with
> > something else?
>
> Linus T. told that it can be done inside GPIO realm. This version tries
> (badly in my opinion) to achieve that.
>

I'm seeing William and Arnd have some unaddressed issues with patch 1
(with using __builtin_unreachable()).

Admittedly I didn't follow the previous iterations too much so I may
miss some history behind it. Why do the first two patches go into lib
if this is supposed to be gpiolib-only?

Bartosz