Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:f347:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp81070pxu; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 22:10:53 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyyNGc2fFQzZkisTe2dkuf1wdChRdQyYvoaqzUPc2maS/SSoECsYtdT7HBcjEfDtIE03KWD X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:b1c8:: with SMTP id bv8mr5354416ejb.208.1609999853415; Wed, 06 Jan 2021 22:10:53 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1609999853; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=wmTtzcL8v2oBDjUpsoZ8Ilw4hVXFtOspvpyxAVNgyA5V6wT9FBAA1sUFOJGk6KsFVg feGTjKSJ7D8B84EJl1E43GKKhBkeQ2XYKApJpFVUOlsyv+bflPJjbrZtXaEVcBF42hKe FdcmZJ3K3ELLTg4uYI2CnXWnTOZm6CzqI+cTw5Qk3qav55hKcHw3K7gpZ7MVPFY4hAya xbBQ3/ty4uZTaGGMYgiAgQz03KpbqZVwYlVRvTbfs3P6nmVL0NKtyy03GV+D4zizjbFZ q1JvKDmRRSYKYe7DCC0ZaV5d5t2XuY5LwhFS3aAWt3oX5flENtdvIm1VnUQKPibg9Zll 6N8g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:message-id:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:date:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :sender:dkim-signature; bh=7fshkn7pRC+xQGJefTHPAx+Ob/QQACNkxHyRcSYC2wQ=; b=IkZ4PmpWVQXApUO4AahLMyJqteBgKv+kLWOQmK4FtqCLVj5x+C7jX5FJLFbsx1p2AT svQxp3ybXQKX2MYcnKxJPQ/QpizHPybjNsp5ULg+0Nh8534QKjtwXfJvei9LagkEmrqO bjBg7GXo34kqEJmM2vcC0TA+fLVxuzBw/w7L0PCM3B53iDyBoXsC74LYQSs45aYGmaJv 6ZCEFE0eBndpZGMx18NOCMqu7zn42z4+YfYW4O+beEWFO3h9ZtP2/JBIKfsjLNkCqI3E WMGfFKrP0GQYQmkvUWihLNJME30H+FoUWsiL/W6g2IY5hWSVP7ZS28U0hnajWM04DJPa T9gw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@mg.codeaurora.org header.s=smtp header.b=w2eunPIP; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id qh17si1807739ejb.115.2021.01.06.22.10.30; Wed, 06 Jan 2021 22:10:53 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@mg.codeaurora.org header.s=smtp header.b=w2eunPIP; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726315AbhAGGII (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 7 Jan 2021 01:08:08 -0500 Received: from so254-31.mailgun.net ([198.61.254.31]:19405 "EHLO so254-31.mailgun.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726231AbhAGGIH (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jan 2021 01:08:07 -0500 DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; v=1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mg.codeaurora.org; q=dns/txt; s=smtp; t=1609999662; h=Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Subject: Cc: To: From: Date: Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type: MIME-Version: Sender; bh=7fshkn7pRC+xQGJefTHPAx+Ob/QQACNkxHyRcSYC2wQ=; b=w2eunPIPKugLDTGkLGj2qrx1tA5F+nVxpj34TrnWPg0ZO/4onxMQ1JyFmq0LdSTcKm3BGwJd NEF8cJE57/NzHQbsErSAyyIW31IY5FqjPhLlBIqsPYwxFynexcEiySV9M/2Uh3we3KsGqNAw Vi8EXpBxDK7LMGmcxPtZLiFtuEM= X-Mailgun-Sending-Ip: 198.61.254.31 X-Mailgun-Sid: WyI0MWYwYSIsICJsaW51eC1rZXJuZWxAdmdlci5rZXJuZWwub3JnIiwgImJlOWU0YSJd Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org (ec2-35-166-182-171.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [35.166.182.171]) by smtp-out-n06.prod.us-west-2.postgun.com with SMTP id 5ff6a513661021aa28fadf98 (version=TLS1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256); Thu, 07 Jan 2021 06:07:15 GMT Sender: cang=codeaurora.org@mg.codeaurora.org Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 0C950C433ED; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 06:07:15 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-caf-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=2.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.codeaurora.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: cang) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 30FF4C433CA; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 06:07:14 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2021 14:07:14 +0800 From: Can Guo To: Jaegeuk Kim Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@android.com, alim.akhtar@samsung.com, avri.altman@wdc.com, bvanassche@acm.org, martin.petersen@oracle.com, stanley.chu@mediatek.com, Jaegeuk Kim Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] scsi: ufs: handle LINERESET with correct tm_cmd In-Reply-To: <20210106214109.44041-3-jaegeuk@kernel.org> References: <20210106214109.44041-1-jaegeuk@kernel.org> <20210106214109.44041-3-jaegeuk@kernel.org> Message-ID: <96a159d6b64fce18ee63a12a6acde2a2@codeaurora.org> X-Sender: cang@codeaurora.org User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.3.9 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Jaegeuk, On 2021-01-07 05:41, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > From: Jaegeuk Kim > > This fixes a warning caused by wrong reserve tag usage in > __ufshcd_issue_tm_cmd. > > WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 7 at block/blk-core.c:630 > blk_get_request+0x68/0x70 > WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 157 at block/blk-mq-tag.c:82 > blk_mq_get_tag+0x438/0x46c > > And, in ufshcd_err_handler(), we can avoid to send tm_cmd before > aborting > outstanding commands by waiting a bit for IO completion like this. > > __ufshcd_issue_tm_cmd: task management cmd 0x80 timed-out > > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim > --- > drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- > 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c > index 1678cec08b51..47fc8da3cbf9 100644 > --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c > +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c > @@ -44,6 +44,9 @@ > /* Query request timeout */ > #define QUERY_REQ_TIMEOUT 1500 /* 1.5 seconds */ > > +/* LINERESET TIME OUT */ > +#define LINERESET_IO_TIMEOUT_MS (30000) /* 30 sec */ > + > /* Task management command timeout */ > #define TM_CMD_TIMEOUT 100 /* msecs */ > > @@ -5899,6 +5902,8 @@ static void ufshcd_err_handler(struct work_struct > *work) > * check if power mode restore is needed. > */ > if (hba->saved_uic_err & UFSHCD_UIC_PA_GENERIC_ERROR) { > + ktime_t start = ktime_get(); I don't see the connection btw line-reset and following tmf cmd. My point is that line-reset is not the only non-fatal error which leads us to the following tmf cmd. So the wait should be outside of this check - just put it right before clearing outstanding reqs. Thanks, Can Guo. > + > hba->saved_uic_err &= ~UFSHCD_UIC_PA_GENERIC_ERROR; > if (!hba->saved_uic_err) > hba->saved_err &= ~UIC_ERROR; > @@ -5906,6 +5911,20 @@ static void ufshcd_err_handler(struct > work_struct *work) > if (ufshcd_is_pwr_mode_restore_needed(hba)) > needs_restore = true; > spin_lock_irqsave(hba->host->host_lock, flags); > + /* Wait for IO completion to avoid aborting IOs */ > + while (hba->outstanding_reqs) { > + ufshcd_complete_requests(hba); > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(hba->host->host_lock, flags); > + schedule(); > + spin_lock_irqsave(hba->host->host_lock, flags); > + if (ktime_to_ms(ktime_sub(ktime_get(), start)) > > + LINERESET_IO_TIMEOUT_MS) { > + dev_err(hba->dev, "%s: timeout, outstanding=0x%lx\n", > + __func__, hba->outstanding_reqs); > + break; > + } > + } > + > if (!hba->saved_err && !needs_restore) > goto skip_err_handling; > } > @@ -6302,9 +6321,13 @@ static irqreturn_t ufshcd_intr(int irq, void > *__hba) > intr_status = ufshcd_readl(hba, REG_INTERRUPT_STATUS); > } > > - if (enabled_intr_status && retval == IRQ_NONE) { > - dev_err(hba->dev, "%s: Unhandled interrupt 0x%08x\n", > - __func__, intr_status); > + if (enabled_intr_status && retval == IRQ_NONE && > + !ufshcd_eh_in_progress(hba)) { > + dev_err(hba->dev, "%s: Unhandled interrupt 0x%08x (0x%08x, > 0x%08x)\n", > + __func__, > + intr_status, > + hba->ufs_stats.last_intr_status, > + enabled_intr_status); > ufshcd_dump_regs(hba, 0, UFSHCI_REG_SPACE_SIZE, "host_regs: "); > } > > @@ -6348,7 +6371,11 @@ static int __ufshcd_issue_tm_cmd(struct ufs_hba > *hba, > * Even though we use wait_event() which sleeps indefinitely, > * the maximum wait time is bounded by %TM_CMD_TIMEOUT. > */ > - req = blk_get_request(q, REQ_OP_DRV_OUT, BLK_MQ_REQ_RESERVED); > + req = blk_get_request(q, REQ_OP_DRV_OUT, BLK_MQ_REQ_RESERVED | > + BLK_MQ_REQ_NOWAIT); > + if (IS_ERR(req)) > + return PTR_ERR(req); > + > req->end_io_data = &wait; > free_slot = req->tag; > WARN_ON_ONCE(free_slot < 0 || free_slot >= hba->nutmrs); > @@ -9355,6 +9382,7 @@ int ufshcd_init(struct ufs_hba *hba, void > __iomem *mmio_base, unsigned int irq) > > hba->tmf_tag_set = (struct blk_mq_tag_set) { > .nr_hw_queues = 1, > + .reserved_tags = 1, > .queue_depth = hba->nutmrs, > .ops = &ufshcd_tmf_ops, > .flags = BLK_MQ_F_NO_SCHED,