Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Sender: cang=codeaurora.org@mg.codeaurora.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date:   Thu, 07 Jan 2021 14:10:19 +0800
From:   Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org>
To:     Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
        kernel-team@android.com, alim.akhtar@samsung.com,
        avri.altman@wdc.com, bvanassche@acm.org,
        martin.petersen@oracle.com, stanley.chu@mediatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] scsi: ufs: fix livelock of ufshcd_clear_ua_wluns
In-Reply-To: <20210106214109.44041-2-jaegeuk@kernel.org>
References: <20210106214109.44041-1-jaegeuk@kernel.org>
 <20210106214109.44041-2-jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Message-ID: <fc4cb27df8bd6b2c1037d82e4b5d3860@codeaurora.org>
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.3.9
Precedence: bulk

On 2021-01-07 05:41, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> When gate_work/ungate_work gets an error during hibern8_enter or exit,
>  ufshcd_err_handler()
>    ufshcd_scsi_block_requests()
>    ufshcd_reset_and_restore()
>      ufshcd_clear_ua_wluns() -> stuck
>    ufshcd_scsi_unblock_requests()
> 
> In order to avoid it, ufshcd_clear_ua_wluns() can be called per 
> recovery flows
> such as suspend/resume, link_recovery, and error_handler.
> 
> Fixes: 1918651f2d7e ("scsi: ufs: Clear UAC for RPMB after ufshcd 
> resets")
> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> index bedb822a40a3..1678cec08b51 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> @@ -3996,6 +3996,8 @@ int ufshcd_link_recovery(struct ufs_hba *hba)
>  	if (ret)
>  		dev_err(hba->dev, "%s: link recovery failed, err %d",
>  			__func__, ret);
> +	else
> +		ufshcd_clear_ua_wluns(hba);

Can we put it right after ufshcd_scsi_add_wlus() in ufshcd_add_lus()?

Thanks,
Can Guo.

> 
>  	return ret;
>  }
> @@ -6003,6 +6005,9 @@ static void ufshcd_err_handler(struct work_struct 
> *work)
>  	ufshcd_scsi_unblock_requests(hba);
>  	ufshcd_err_handling_unprepare(hba);
>  	up(&hba->eh_sem);
> +
> +	if (!err && needs_reset)
> +		ufshcd_clear_ua_wluns(hba);
>  }
> 
>  /**
> @@ -6940,14 +6945,11 @@ static int
> ufshcd_host_reset_and_restore(struct ufs_hba *hba)
>  	ufshcd_set_clk_freq(hba, true);
> 
>  	err = ufshcd_hba_enable(hba);
> -	if (err)
> -		goto out;
> 
>  	/* Establish the link again and restore the device */
> -	err = ufshcd_probe_hba(hba, false);
>  	if (!err)
> -		ufshcd_clear_ua_wluns(hba);
> -out:
> +		err = ufshcd_probe_hba(hba, false);
> +
>  	if (err)
>  		dev_err(hba->dev, "%s: Host init failed %d\n", __func__, err);
>  	ufshcd_update_evt_hist(hba, UFS_EVT_HOST_RESET, (u32)err);
> @@ -8777,6 +8779,7 @@ static int ufshcd_suspend(struct ufs_hba *hba,
> enum ufs_pm_op pm_op)
>  		ufshcd_resume_clkscaling(hba);
>  	hba->clk_gating.is_suspended = false;
>  	hba->dev_info.b_rpm_dev_flush_capable = false;
> +	ufshcd_clear_ua_wluns(hba);
>  	ufshcd_release(hba);
>  out:
>  	if (hba->dev_info.b_rpm_dev_flush_capable) {
> @@ -8887,6 +8890,8 @@ static int ufshcd_resume(struct ufs_hba *hba,
> enum ufs_pm_op pm_op)
>  		cancel_delayed_work(&hba->rpm_dev_flush_recheck_work);
>  	}
> 
> +	ufshcd_clear_ua_wluns(hba);
> +
>  	/* Schedule clock gating in case of no access to UFS device yet */
>  	ufshcd_release(hba);