Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:2785:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id ia5csp22401pxb; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 20:11:13 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwjy6efkIgoXDuClpCdaKwvAe2SvogUSGE6mmvlraFz7MJw584tbVJepPMBn6xxNhjITYKR X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:eb49:: with SMTP id mc9mr1315643ejb.487.1610079073147; Thu, 07 Jan 2021 20:11:13 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1610079073; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=fk2mmHtb1UB3mod5Xka9QQhSjacJNF82DOBb2DI514NBvAYT56DPKFuokWjhR208et dBzju8id6sa0osrUr6KCRIVpaoMm64DN6peGfyrASjtH5mbMnu46pIwrTMyPCHROGpxI 2Z0zBdQjNR6LQj0jkp8sTBsQksudiGlhTv5J0iGIrgAnnDPaexb0ASZknZIZ1fJH4pFQ RCxakS3I45FlKothQGDuroS8Po4ZLR/vUp1FSvE/NjWwmjWwpdeVyHVkb2n75LZ/MVTW k0YV3rxSPDhRMTzj14eH4XwlruDcwCZwcFmKafiLK4M4UAOrBADhrjIVVzMnDgiv5akE 0wfQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject :cc:to:from:dkim-signature:dkim-filter; bh=NblfeM4gSvMTuDUnr/Ywi4/vYvY7tsPtE6p51c4jjrY=; b=T6uIL6lTtJ154giSwwcpWsPGn1GceY/Ceg41i0hKfU8o7tGQqUYHgTp6w3mrvDR/CB oQ9FZ17F2wnOGQRj88oPf4erP4TLwtxo+XWmYuUb8OXzXCYcgzeUrR8IvaPEn2y2rNIg FjcaXUlGVuecpyRM88gBpLG618Huy0ejdGuFyNfe4HmJYBys9pKMrf1S4oEINCzj5XWY rDd53G1gCLKXJa9AZlIBVn0gMrOXIfzP23xtor3YECIeOctLnDPXUYxU2Ng/LYs9awvl /mlg5idsc9rF3NAnbQyrWMfwUSvnZQmGnXIOyhspCM5cFdvcuIS4Wk8eMpdiz8eJA9dG /rBA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linux.microsoft.com header.s=default header.b=KTB1yGAb; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linux.microsoft.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v21si3041419edt.309.2021.01.07.20.10.49; Thu, 07 Jan 2021 20:11:13 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linux.microsoft.com header.s=default header.b=KTB1yGAb; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linux.microsoft.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727617AbhAHEI4 (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 7 Jan 2021 23:08:56 -0500 Received: from linux.microsoft.com ([13.77.154.182]:59260 "EHLO linux.microsoft.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727454AbhAHEIq (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jan 2021 23:08:46 -0500 Received: from tusharsu-Ubuntu.lan (c-71-197-163-6.hsd1.wa.comcast.net [71.197.163.6]) by linux.microsoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 273D920B6C46; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 20:07:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 linux.microsoft.com 273D920B6C46 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.microsoft.com; s=default; t=1610078846; bh=NblfeM4gSvMTuDUnr/Ywi4/vYvY7tsPtE6p51c4jjrY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=KTB1yGAbNVHfWJR6Tw/kNYwCDj3hdE5krKuPj5C0Oa9QiOhpDKgjTAdxK3p4WgctB mSavfFsrZhphARf9DfRA4Uxl2dtO2recLkn8EkoSltEOvBuOgPMO+hb++vE7ebbGrc 0oZNB2q722hUNtT2HzykKzKtltHC0O+2hnJrD84g= From: Tushar Sugandhi To: zohar@linux.ibm.com, stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com, casey@schaufler-ca.com, agk@redhat.com, snitzer@redhat.com, gmazyland@gmail.com, paul@paul-moore.com Cc: tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com, sashal@kernel.org, jmorris@namei.org, nramas@linux.microsoft.com, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com Subject: [PATCH v10 7/8] IMA: define a builtin critical data measurement policy Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2021 20:07:07 -0800 Message-Id: <20210108040708.8389-8-tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20210108040708.8389-1-tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com> References: <20210108040708.8389-1-tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian Define a new critical data builtin policy to allow measuring early kernel integrity critical data before a custom IMA policy is loaded. Update the documentation on kernel parameters to document the new critical data builtin policy. Signed-off-by: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian Reviewed-by: Tyler Hicks Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar --- Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 5 ++++- security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 12 ++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt index 526d65d8573a..6034d75c3ca0 100644 --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt @@ -1746,7 +1746,7 @@ ima_policy= [IMA] The builtin policies to load during IMA setup. Format: "tcb | appraise_tcb | secure_boot | - fail_securely" + fail_securely | critical_data" The "tcb" policy measures all programs exec'd, files mmap'd for exec, and all files opened with the read @@ -1765,6 +1765,9 @@ filesystems with the SB_I_UNVERIFIABLE_SIGNATURE flag. + The "critical_data" policy measures kernel integrity + critical data. + ima_tcb [IMA] Deprecated. Use ima_policy= instead. Load a policy which meets the needs of the Trusted Computing Base. This means IMA will measure all diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c index 2c9db2d0b434..9b45d064a87d 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c @@ -206,6 +206,10 @@ static struct ima_rule_entry secure_boot_rules[] __ro_after_init = { .flags = IMA_FUNC | IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED}, }; +static struct ima_rule_entry critical_data_rules[] __ro_after_init = { + {.action = MEASURE, .func = CRITICAL_DATA, .flags = IMA_FUNC}, +}; + /* An array of architecture specific rules */ static struct ima_rule_entry *arch_policy_entry __ro_after_init; @@ -228,6 +232,7 @@ __setup("ima_tcb", default_measure_policy_setup); static bool ima_use_appraise_tcb __initdata; static bool ima_use_secure_boot __initdata; +static bool ima_use_critical_data __initdata; static bool ima_fail_unverifiable_sigs __ro_after_init; static int __init policy_setup(char *str) { @@ -242,6 +247,8 @@ static int __init policy_setup(char *str) ima_use_appraise_tcb = true; else if (strcmp(p, "secure_boot") == 0) ima_use_secure_boot = true; + else if (strcmp(p, "critical_data") == 0) + ima_use_critical_data = true; else if (strcmp(p, "fail_securely") == 0) ima_fail_unverifiable_sigs = true; else @@ -871,6 +878,11 @@ void __init ima_init_policy(void) ARRAY_SIZE(default_appraise_rules), IMA_DEFAULT_POLICY); + if (ima_use_critical_data) + add_rules(critical_data_rules, + ARRAY_SIZE(critical_data_rules), + IMA_DEFAULT_POLICY); + ima_update_policy_flag(); } -- 2.17.1