Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Fri, 8 Jan 2021 09:57:38 +0100
From:   Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
To:     Wilken Gottwalt <wilken.gottwalt@posteo.net>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
        Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@gmail.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>,
        Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@siol.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] hwspinlock: add sun6i hardware spinlock support
Message-ID: <20210108085738.va4onpg3v2pw6ojp@gilmour>
References: <cover.1608721968.git.wilken.gottwalt@posteo.net>
 <0deae76aec31586da45c316546b12bcc316442ee.1608721968.git.wilken.gottwalt@posteo.net>
 <20210106101542.zziwdyhq7arysrsj@gilmour>
 <20210107094314.4cfd5756@monster.powergraphx.local>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In-Reply-To: <20210107094314.4cfd5756@monster.powergraphx.local>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 09:43:14AM +0100, Wilken Gottwalt wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Jan 2021 11:15:42 +0100
> Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech> wrote:
>=20
> > On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 12:35:10PM +0100, Wilken Gottwalt wrote:
> > > Adds the sun6i_hwspinlock driver for the hardware spinlock unit found=
 in
> > > most of the sun6i compatible SoCs.
> > >=20
> > > This unit provides at least 32 spinlocks in hardware. The implementat=
ion
> > > supports 32, 64, 128 or 256 32bit registers. A lock can be taken by
> > > reading a register and released by writing a 0 to it. This driver
> > > supports all 4 spinlock setups, but for now only the first setup (32
> > > locks) seem to exist in available devices. This spinlock unit is shar=
ed
> > > between all ARM cores and the embedded companion core. All of them can
> > > take/release a lock with a single cycle operation. It can be used to
> > > sync access to devices shared by the ARM cores and the companion core.
> > >=20
> > > There are two ways to check if a lock is taken. The first way is to r=
ead
> > > a lock. If a 0 is returned, the lock was free and is taken now. If an=
 1
> > > is returned, the caller has to try again. Which means the lock is tak=
en.
> > > The second way is to read a 32bit wide status register where every bit
> > > represents one of the 32 first locks. According to the datasheets this
> > > status register supports only the 32 first locks. This is the reason =
the
> > > first way (lock read/write) approach is used to be able to cover all =
256
> > > locks in future devices. The driver also reports the amount of suppor=
ted
> > > locks via debugfs.
> > >=20
> > > Signed-off-by: Wilken Gottwalt <wilken.gottwalt@posteo.net>
> >=20
> > Reviewed-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
>=20
> Does it mean the driver is okay and I only need to fix the bindings
> documentation? If so, would you prefer an updated patch set or only the
> documentation patch in a new version?

It means I'm fine with the driver patch but the binding require a new
version. Send a new version of the series with my reviewed-by added to
the driver commit

Maxime