Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964774AbWIISEM (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Sep 2006 14:04:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751350AbWIISEM (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Sep 2006 14:04:12 -0400 Received: from mout0.freenet.de ([194.97.50.131]:5301 "EHLO mout0.freenet.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751349AbWIISEK (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Sep 2006 14:04:10 -0400 Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2006 20:11:56 +0200 To: "Greg KH" , "Phillip Susi" Subject: Re: [PATCH] pktcdvd: added sysfs interface + bio write queue handling fix Reply-To: balagi@justmail.de From: "Thomas Maier" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "petero2@telia.com" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20060908210042.GA6877@kroah.com> <4501E33B.50204@cfl.rr.com> <20060908220129.GB20018@kroah.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20060908220129.GB20018@kroah.com> User-Agent: Opera Mail/9.00 (Win32) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2050 Lines: 52 Hello, >> + write_queue_size (r) Contains the size of the bio write >> + queue. ... >> + mapped_to Symbolic link to mapped block device >> + in the /sys/block tree. > > Shouldn't this whole thing be in /sys/class/ instead of /sys/block/ ? Don't know. I thought, the pktcdvd is a block driver, so put the control files into /sys/block .. Is /sys/class better? If yes, where to put it? > On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 05:40:11PM -0400, Phillip Susi wrote: >> Greg KH wrote: >> >On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 07:55:08PM +0200, Thomas Maier wrote: >> >>+/sys/block/pktcdvd//packet/ >> >>+ statistic (r) Show device statistic. One line with >> >>+ 5 values in following order: >> >>+ packets-started >> >>+ packets-end >> >>+ written in kB >> >>+ read gather in kB >> >>+ read in kB >> > >> >Please no. One value per file is the sysfs rule. >> > >> >> Except in cases like this where you want to read the status of the >> device at a given point in time, and you can't do that unless you grab >> all the values at once. > > Then don't use sysfs for that. And is something like this as critical > to get that kind of information all in one atomic chunk? It seems > merely to be informational. The "statistic" and "info" files are only for information purpose. Into /proc ? No. (i read somewhere /proc should only contain process information in future) In debugfs? Hmm, this files should be infos that users should be able to read, no debug output. Is it ok, if i split the "statistic" into 5 files, and put the "info" into debugfs ? -Thomas Maier - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/