Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:2785:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id ia5csp249787pxb; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 04:06:32 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyhj3AmmsZoijUt7T8UKRwiPIXR9Fvit0dYAX2bvuZWAsZMPcWM2BZL4Ac8QeaQYf1/2miH X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:cb86:: with SMTP id mf6mr2405890ejb.57.1610107591977; Fri, 08 Jan 2021 04:06:31 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1610107591; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=wkjR51SSCFGYjLkEZsIp5QJmcv8xebknCFK9iOMe5amISl+lik4OIMyLf/YBmBW8ZT InSyNcPsIBHQ14l51misTZDpAvnU9cr0VY6HBIRuLOZtkL37rMFWuiU9P7/7VWwhle7J AsHL419FB2bn/5LnPhpgupD4dmuotb1uWEXulyo/ela43Ov9C86l6fCEdjLmREj/EsNT jA2AgrNtTlJHdiav49L755GGg8s39OHa6FmaonXmeT2cn5CnZvkx4AGpFuq+PEqsKZx/ Vei2E/DYmpQEqtWJxJDY9BKgHltkmvphQl9sPnWNxZGoKNjoo2UHRh7Y+O68RB12q8rr Wq7A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=na8gT0e7UGqh+utLyDKggetXotXa5UYGC98yRXD/ipk=; b=k62eob5RMPHcCFsLLDKrVVQC2W36VcdkKrRSKHzn9XqVG/ULHTA2EEaia2Aclzhjp8 otWXkDlgJl7XkCdyzAKayLMee+owN7+h30stjysYvJ6UHEBjjKPvPHj90rz23GAfmdog gQEnN3gSA2g4ZAHR9OuFOxQB6a8pq2l1NOlFjwuJ/GpBpFNobALT2ZI/U/qkfCax197R HB3yVyVmU0yXaEh5TX+iiEIQstAfnuHcVrOQeqB1M9x14eL+E8iEfbuR5iRXegCS3HKy VQczl+/Z7KiygnfEtzUzXEMTEsl6jpkw/BpF0V0RqEmHPv+XKgvGtOE6uagt5x5blDzt 91JQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id ot14si3299380ejb.493.2021.01.08.04.06.07; Fri, 08 Jan 2021 04:06:31 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726508AbhAHMFT (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 8 Jan 2021 07:05:19 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:49854 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725791AbhAHMFT (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jan 2021 07:05:19 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B258431B; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 04:04:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from e120937-lin (unknown [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D95ED3F719; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 04:04:31 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2021 12:04:28 +0000 From: Cristian Marussi To: Thara Gopinath Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, sudeep.holla@arm.com, lukasz.luba@arm.com, james.quinlan@broadcom.com, Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, etienne.carriere@linaro.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, souvik.chakravarty@arm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 02/37] firmware: arm_scmi: introduce protocol handle definitions Message-ID: <20210108120428.GB9138@e120937-lin> References: <20210106201610.26538-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com> <20210106201610.26538-3-cristian.marussi@arm.com> <19054e89-c117-ef85-444e-8e126a8a9efb@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <19054e89-c117-ef85-444e-8e126a8a9efb@linaro.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Thara thanks for reviewing. On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 09:29:17AM -0500, Thara Gopinath wrote: > > > On 1/6/21 3:15 PM, Cristian Marussi wrote: > > Add basic protocol handles definitions and private data helpers support. > > > > A protocol handle identifies a protocol instance initialized against a > > specific handle; it embeds all the references to the core SCMI xfer methods > > that will be needed by a protocol implementation to build and send its own > > protocol specific messages using common core methods. > > > > As such, in the interface, a protocol handle will be passed down from the > > core to the protocol specific initialization callback at init time. > > > > Anyway at this point only definitions are introduced, all protocols > > initialization code and SCMI drivers probing is still based on the old > > interface, so no functional change. > > > > Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi > > --- > > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/common.h | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 2 files changed, 104 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/common.h b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/common.h > > index e052507dc918..977e31224efe 100644 > > --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/common.h > > +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/common.h > > @@ -149,6 +149,65 @@ int scmi_xfer_get_init(const struct scmi_handle *h, u8 msg_id, u8 prot_id, > > size_t tx_size, size_t rx_size, struct scmi_xfer **p); > > void scmi_reset_rx_to_maxsz(const struct scmi_handle *handle, > > struct scmi_xfer *xfer); > > + > > +struct scmi_xfer_ops; > > + > > +/** > > + * struct scmi_protocol_handle - Reference to an initialized protocol instance > > + * > > + * @dev: A reference to the associated SCMI instance device (handle->dev). > > + * @xops: A reference to a struct holding refs to the core xfer operations that > > + * can be used by the protocol implementation to generate SCMI messages. > > + * @set_priv: A method to set protocol private data for this instance. > > + * @get_priv: A method to get protocol private data previously set. > > + * > > + * This structure represents a protocol initialized against specific SCMI > > + * instance and it will be used as follows: > > + * - as a parameter fed from the core to the protocol initialization code so > > + * that it can access the core xfer operations to build and generate SCMI > > + * messages exclusively for the specific underlying protocol instance. > > + * - as an opaque handle fed by an SCMI driver user when it tries to access > > + * this protocol through its own protocol operations. > > + * In this case this handle will be returned as an opaque object together > > + * with the related protocol operations when the SCMI driver tries to access > > + * the protocol. > > + */ > > +struct scmi_protocol_handle { > > + struct device *dev; > > + const struct scmi_xfer_ops *xops; > > + int (*set_priv)(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph, void *priv); > > + void *(*get_priv)(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph); > > +}; > > + > > +/** > > + * struct scmi_xfer_ops - References to the core SCMI xfer operations. > > + * @version_get: Get this version protocol. > > + * @xfer_get_init: Initialize one struct xfer if any xfer slot is free. > > + * @reset_rx_to_maxsz: Reset rx size to max transport size. > > + * @do_xfer: Do the SCMI transfer. > > + * @do_xfer_with_response: Do the SCMI transfer waiting for a response. > > + * @xfer_put: Free the xfer slot. > > + * > > + * Note that all this operations expect a protocol handle as first parameter; > > + * they then internally use it to infer the underlying protocol number: this > > + * way is not possible for a protocol implementation to forge messages for > > + * another protocol. > > + */ > > +struct scmi_xfer_ops { > > Maybe move the definition above struct scmi_protocol_handle to avoid a > declaration ? > But all the ops defined inside scmi_xfer_ops refers then to a param struct scmi_protocol_handle, so I'd need anyway a similar declaration the other way around. If not: linux/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/common.h:178:32: warning: ‘struct scmi_protocol_handle’ declared inside parameter list will not be visible outside of this definition or declaration Thanks Cristian > > -- > Warm Regards > Thara