Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751395AbWIIVo6 (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Sep 2006 17:44:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751396AbWIIVo6 (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Sep 2006 17:44:58 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:15494 "EHLO mx2.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751395AbWIIVo5 (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Sep 2006 17:44:57 -0400 From: Andi Kleen To: john stultz Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] x86_64: Generic timekeeping for x86_64 Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 22:30:49 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20060907021820.31476.17484.sendpatchset@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20060907021820.31476.17484.sendpatchset@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200609092230.49943.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 982 Lines: 25 On Thursday 07 September 2006 04:18, john stultz wrote: > Hey Andi, > Just wanted to send this second pass on the x86_64 generic > timekeeping conversion. It includes a number of changes you suggested, > however its possible I missed a few things. I've made sure the patchset > compiles at each stage, and atleast w/ the box I was using it booted > each step as well. Looks all reasonable from a quick look. I assume it will clash with the recent patch to remove wall_jiffies use, but that should be easy to fix. How does the performance of the user space gettimeofday look compared to the old code in TSC mode? BTW I got some experimental code to put clock_gettime into user space too, but that can be later merged I guess. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/