Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] arm64: dts: ti: k3: squelch warnings regarding no
 #address-cells for interrupt-controller
To:     Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>, Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>,
        Device Tree Mailing List <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
CC:     Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>,
        Linux ARM Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@ti.com>,
        Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
References: <20201117161942.38754-1-nsekhar@ti.com>
 <20201117161942.38754-3-nsekhar@ti.com>
 <ab9658ef-c8a7-155b-acb1-effa872132ca@ti.com>
 <20201118151259.kpag44djji4ssiup@eldest>
 <18e41dba-a3dd-308a-605e-63b76ca638e5@ti.com>
 <20201119132829.sr435jf6s4275q4i@boxlike>
 <313a9cd5-7411-4ae1-cde4-42a2c18d11e6@ti.com>
 <20201124012100.fq7w7bjxvewuhbt2@shirt>
 <8885dd79-061b-82e3-1aeb-a318f7d8256d@ti.com>
 <20201127142340.ei7o4zkg5trwcspy@chevron>
From:   Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
Message-ID: <2c6df02e-e7a8-fa48-27bc-140bfa500360@ti.com>
Date:   Fri, 8 Jan 2021 19:35:46 +0530
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20201127142340.ei7o4zkg5trwcspy@chevron>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

Hi Rob, Grygorii,

On 27/11/20 7:53 pm, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 09:46-20201124, Sekhar Nori wrote:
>> On 24/11/20 6:51 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>>> On 09:45-20201123, Sekhar Nori wrote:
>>>>>> The main reason I commented - is hope to get some clarification from DT maintainers.
>>>>>> 90% of interrupt-controller nodes do not have #address-cells and I never seen in in GPIO nodes
>>>>>> (most often is present in PCI and GIC nodes).
>>>>>> and nobody seems fixing it. So, if we are going to move this direction it's reasonable to get clarification to be sure.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And there is no "never" here - #address-cells always can be added if really required.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> OK - as a GPIO node, but as an interrupt-controller node, I was
>>>>> looking at [1] and wondering if that was the precedence.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, will be good to get direction from the DT maintainers on this
>>>>> topic.
>>>>

Is there a conclusion on this topic?  Without adding address-cells for interrupt
controller we will be introducing new warning for all the new nodes we are adding.

Thanks and regards,
Lokesh