Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Sat, 9 Jan 2021 04:05:38 +0200
From:   Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc:     Daniel Scally <djrscally@gmail.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
        devel@acpica.org, lenb@kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
        mchehab@kernel.org, sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com,
        yong.zhi@intel.com, sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com,
        bingbu.cao@intel.com, tian.shu.qiu@intel.com,
        robert.moore@intel.com, erik.kaneda@intel.com, pmladek@suse.com,
        rostedt@goodmis.org, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com,
        linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk,
        laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com,
        jacopo+renesas@jmondi.org, kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com,
        hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl, m.felsch@pengutronix.de,
        niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se,
        prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com, slongerbeam@gmail.com,
        heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 07/15] device property: Define format macros for ports
 and endpoints
Message-ID: <X/kPck60UO/NYuRa@pendragon.ideasonboard.com>
References: <20210107132838.396641-1-djrscally@gmail.com>
 <20210107132838.396641-8-djrscally@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20210107132838.396641-8-djrscally@gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

Hi Rafael,

Could you please let us know with an Acked-by if this patch can be
merged through the linux-media tree for v5.12 ? The cover letter
contains additional details (in a nutshell, this is a cross-tree series
and we would like to avoid topic branches).

On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 01:28:30PM +0000, Daniel Scally wrote:
> OF, ACPI and software_nodes all implement graphs including nodes for ports
> and endpoints. These are all intended to be named with a common schema,
> as "port@n" and "endpoint@n" where n is an unsigned int representing the
> index of the node. To ensure commonality across the subsystems, provide a
> set of macros to define the format.
> 
> Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
> Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Scally <djrscally@gmail.com>
> ---
> Changes in v5:
> 
> 	- Changed commit subject
> 
>  include/linux/fwnode.h | 7 +++++++
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/fwnode.h b/include/linux/fwnode.h
> index fde4ad97564c..77414e431e89 100644
> --- a/include/linux/fwnode.h
> +++ b/include/linux/fwnode.h
> @@ -50,6 +50,13 @@ struct fwnode_endpoint {
>  	const struct fwnode_handle *local_fwnode;
>  };
>  
> +/*
> + * ports and endpoints defined as software_nodes should all follow a common
> + * naming scheme; use these macros to ensure commonality.
> + */
> +#define SWNODE_GRAPH_PORT_NAME_FMT		"port@%u"
> +#define SWNODE_GRAPH_ENDPOINT_NAME_FMT		"endpoint@%u"
> +
>  #define NR_FWNODE_REFERENCE_ARGS	8
>  
>  /**

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart