Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:2785:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id ia5csp1007987pxb; Sat, 9 Jan 2021 04:33:46 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwfV9JxwwZuk3i3gpWxhRnrzW7UAfiTQ1l23GBPAWCo+/jRMYCq5EZHbHyLrPtgQ/WuTljQ X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:3099:: with SMTP id 25mr5513033ejv.321.1610195626252; Sat, 09 Jan 2021 04:33:46 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1610195626; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=CbqwfIjsG6l6GchOfU6u62PDP8AATsg18WmuT/GqJjwk/l/Sjvqpd2XEtP+TzYXjnE UAhEtCHAIi5XJNuyHP3/t31R0seUnwcKHzRPlFS93vR6Kw5qMG7GVv3gzqtEundyVNwR CbVH7vqDVuGSpKr2QrKM6e656BzFXT7QRi5LWVjkFrcpVZ4zvWIFqm1KEYlmyXbern0Z OraeyhxE9pJTeVll11HaebQhd4B5/xOYZyNEYARUfdmVDhGU6ACcpplmMFLYjB0B7GG1 BhmLBPGNxVV1CldoN2fWQ8s1ZlOqbh70Vbkn3JW3pisOloYWpgHcRau6JtSWXJX1/iLO Gl8w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:message-id:subject:to:from:date :content-transfer-encoding:dkim-signature:mime-version; bh=Eon0tGZk0CFdq1kd5BIcC6epLed41s3TPWqqaJMUuMg=; b=cVkO6LNieBqPyqQnUAmMCP/hIoDfeVdNAhwNEiGM4DNCT7FTSyfCa7tJzDPDREocAc kcXH0FFzkdwEBqJrel4k9w5gxfG3Hl1hpDhaIW1SjJogyWKSN4yhi3WNCF5tZRrpLi6G lnjFnQDwTIveFn9WkLTYE2g1S/8cs6A9/V/5dtzzJyD96VRtvlW7fH6n4kYuvJ4cDdmm 2Qnp3OBJmCgOFZ8jbovQiJ+pFBuclxwmcMqduLjIrFLNwMXF/1T/s434eygVJFx5dwwb S9T6ZOyLkpt1GoXUQrlJ+JCDsbdUNwwEwfW72OmQWLUE2P7AKL/+QOQCGwMXOlVAEE8C SgDQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@firemail.cc header.s=mail header.b=q7RSbXQ1; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k25si4520014ejz.91.2021.01.09.04.33.22; Sat, 09 Jan 2021 04:33:46 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@firemail.cc header.s=mail header.b=q7RSbXQ1; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726471AbhAIMbb (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 9 Jan 2021 07:31:31 -0500 Received: from mail.cock.li ([37.120.193.124]:43426 "EHLO mail.cock.li" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725896AbhAIMbb (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Jan 2021 07:31:31 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=firemail.cc; s=mail; t=1610195440; bh=K7xFAmTyeXv3xrpa3PQqsooMReKn36uGXHQtqdECa6I=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=q7RSbXQ1r62ufAhZRO7Xr75jOXbgG2dHxMSS9VQqLssCTdFYz5mIlvtf8I4yEWYNZ wRZXSv3xaL1y6Or85wTdE7PiiLTohKvKxuplKI1eSM2PsaiAvmAkHxG8wd0Bn02vah Fhk7ZemfjBFuciVyVe5gu0VW4e0gTpC+zADZYAHmeqRthALxcSJN7uYzvBba7PJiVQ qL0RuOYz2bf+6Dpw8k01FK9UMnsgCQbxmTIYsvwlY72HsCrAmGp4RxPw9Hr0hxV6tr uYvYA0mDmooy9E72sto8hHgjHfNa+5aBBmmpECyF9YcZaoE+3HIf+htktPsuXs7Ziv iYV0voJ0nbzJQ== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2021 12:30:41 +0000 From: nipponmail@firemail.cc To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Grsecurity GPL Violations: Linus/FSF/SFConservancy won't defend. Claw back your copyrights. BSD-in-Practice was not the deal. Message-ID: <9b5053f0092803e31b8939307e53192b@firemail.cc> X-Sender: nipponmail@firemail.cc User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.3.15 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Silence is consent. > Are there FOSS developers making decent money via Patreon, GoFundMe, > whatever? Yes, Grsecurity is making good money. They simply added a no-redistribution agreement to their patch of the Linux Kernel. > ( > https://perens.com/2017/06/28/warning-grsecurity-potential-contributory-infringement-risk-for-customers/ > ) The FSF, Software Freedom Conservancy, and the Corporate Linux Kernel Developers all agree that this is fine (silence is consent). > https://twitter.com/spendergrsec/status/1293155787859206146 > Importantly, neither the FSF nor the SFC, nor in fact any actual lawyer > agrees with this bizarre claim from an anonymous troll. More info about > the source of the claim can be found here: > https://grsecurity.net/setting_the_record_straight_on_oss_v_perens_part1 > Thanks for doing your part, "Dr" to continue the troll's harrassment >> LOL. " #GRSecurity violates both the Linux kernel's copyright and the >> #GCC #copyright by forbidding redistribution of the patches (in their >> Access Agreement): which are non-seperable derivative works... Contributors should blanket-revoke their contributions from all free-takers since they didn't agree to BSD-in-Practice. They should also claw-back any transferred copyrights from the FSF using the 30 year clawback provision in the US Copyright Act. Design of how a program works is a copyrightable aspect (Ex: How RMS designed GCC 30 years ago or so etc) Had to repost this because the linux admins deleted the email: > https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/12/28/2518 > The message you requested cannot be found. > The message you requested cannot be found. The message with the url > http://feisty.lkml.org/lkml/2020/12/28/2518 does not exist in the > database. Grsecurity GPL Violations: Bring a CASE act claim every time GrSecurity releases a new infringing work? (GRSecurity blatantly violates the clause in the Linux kernel and GCC copyright licenses regarding adding addtional terms between the licensee of the kernel / gcc and furthur down-the-line licensees, regarding derivative works) (The linux kernel has 1000s of copyright holders) (All who shake at the knees at the thought of initiating a federal Copyright lawsuit)