Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20210110004435.26382-1-aarcange@redhat.com> <CAHk-=wghqNywtf=sRv_5FmG=+hPGqj=KWakw34tNeoZ1wPuaHg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHk-=wj5=1DKbQut1-21EwQbMSghNL3KOSd82rNrBhuG9+eekA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wj5=1DKbQut1-21EwQbMSghNL3KOSd82rNrBhuG9+eekA@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Sat, 9 Jan 2021 17:37:09 -0800
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wg3zWaXaKN1N=qTWiuLFvEz3e_d5oZSgOEfbSOrXJvVtQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] mm: restore full accuracy in COW page reuse
To:     Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
        Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>,
        Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
        Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
        "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
        Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
        Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
        Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>,
        Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Jan 9, 2021 at 5:19 PM Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> And no, I didn't make the UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT code take the mmap_sem
> for writing. For whoever wants to look at that, it's
> mwriteprotect_range() in mm/userfaultfd.c and the fix is literally to
> turn the read-lock (and unlock) into a write-lock (and unlock).

Oh, and if it wasn't obvious, we'll have to debate what to do with
trying to mprotect() a pinned page. Do we just ignore the pinned page
(the way my clear_refs patch did)? Or do we turn it into -EBUSY? Or
what?

So it's not *just* the locking that needs to be fixed. But just take a
look at that suggested clear_refs patch of mine - it sure isn't
complicated.

              Linus