Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:2785:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id ia5csp2471297pxb; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 10:24:41 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxVppJWZmTuvcsmhuURxlTZRpRUnZVBpq5+g62NtPW3jtcuV3AfRkuF6mqiObmA6a01X6Jc X-Received: by 2002:a50:9310:: with SMTP id m16mr519230eda.94.1610389481614; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 10:24:41 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1610389481; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=rOfdys/yMqmDutn4uTbwUTWPjU9fXRHROWwBpFednPTMKx/mpbA+VJMmXsl/34GBC8 Z1NG+xnFfahZdAijGmMcHd9dao+7FNPtuv2OikdKqr9O4fGO1MbVN+YllvE89CIE+z/I vNqv92HX8AxhR2XUuV/tv7UpARsS/kY7e4no4myq5gmI/IA0Ls2alSEJkHYaP8gQ4Qkt Eu83h15ZLZhgYZbG0WMO6snUaiHHABer3ARFyYQ/UVB5osPd6mWxaUwI4T+mcxLyQXBT e1Wu5LeDdbZyd36/GdBWTfIlYHZe+Se9e9PjpLG2iU7P2sKg/txURlU1ndCwkhgBJ2kA 5wmw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=TYWlhjeSCaIEqO1v9QnvrLKB2PRHzbucavU7kJHqFzA=; b=z2ALv1yn4AW9VrxiHhH20+7TERE5KHb/BtgRd1OjIj6ZJuwdvrsD2Fj7Bwj3e97kyI kV7tnTLT3OZ6ohPmLDWbewlkKHPIyJgMCj3TobILu5RnMajrXAsEgYX+ooHabQ6pfL32 hBUOu6xtWQIUZNgB/zh65OXoq6+hTkDGM+XMQp16sUYNDskZKMtUn/YrbAFABDVu/a0n Dwx/KAInR7YqUXk/oETOGqR2EoJ8CC1CdJffD3VqM2hxyP+F8eBnabVsnufw8cmu5m5g vNX3tqQ6zRvJg2iYSTuDEyPAkpOFBzwRUriX0pl/GpQVN4InH0fKji9SBOESmONt4nRM QN+g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w16si215458edu.211.2021.01.11.10.24.16; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 10:24:41 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2390361AbhAKSVi (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 11 Jan 2021 13:21:38 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:34234 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2390214AbhAKSVh (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jan 2021 13:21:37 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5661911FB; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 10:20:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from e107158-lin.cambridge.arm.com (unknown [10.1.194.78]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1F3DD3F70D; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 10:20:50 -0800 (PST) From: Qais Yousef To: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org Cc: Alexei Starovoitov , Andrii Nakryiko , Daniel Borkmann , Steven Rostedt , "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Qais Yousef Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] selftests: bpf: Add a new test for bare tracepoints Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 18:20:27 +0000 Message-Id: <20210111182027.1448538-3-qais.yousef@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20210111182027.1448538-1-qais.yousef@arm.com> References: <20210111182027.1448538-1-qais.yousef@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Reuse module_attach infrastructure to add a new bare tracepoint to check we can attach to it as a raw tracepoint. Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef --- Andrii I was getting the error below when I was trying to run the test. I had to comment out all related fentry* code to be able to test the raw_tp stuff. Not sure something I've done wrong or it's broken for some reason. I was on v5.11-rc2. $ sudo ./test_progs -v -t module_attach bpf_testmod.ko is already unloaded. Loading bpf_testmod.ko... Successfully loaded bpf_testmod.ko. test_module_attach:PASS:skel_open 0 nsec test_module_attach:PASS:set_attach_target 0 nsec test_module_attach:PASS:skel_load 0 nsec libbpf: prog 'handle_fentry': failed to attach: ERROR: strerror_r(-524)=22 libbpf: failed to auto-attach program 'handle_fentry': -524 test_module_attach:FAIL:skel_attach skeleton attach failed: -524 #58 module_attach:FAIL Successfully unloaded bpf_testmod.ko. Summary: 0/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 1 FAILED .../selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod-events.h | 6 ++++++ tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c | 2 ++ tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/module_attach.c | 1 + tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_module_attach.c | 10 ++++++++++ 4 files changed, 19 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod-events.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod-events.h index b83ea448bc79..e1ada753f10c 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod-events.h +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod-events.h @@ -28,6 +28,12 @@ TRACE_EVENT(bpf_testmod_test_read, __entry->pid, __entry->comm, __entry->off, __entry->len) ); +/* A bare tracepoint with no event associated with it */ +DECLARE_TRACE(bpf_testmod_test_read_bare, + TP_PROTO(struct task_struct *task, struct bpf_testmod_test_read_ctx *ctx), + TP_ARGS(task, ctx) +); + #endif /* _BPF_TESTMOD_EVENTS_H */ #undef TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c index 2df19d73ca49..d63cebdaca44 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c @@ -22,6 +22,8 @@ bpf_testmod_test_read(struct file *file, struct kobject *kobj, }; trace_bpf_testmod_test_read(current, &ctx); + ctx.len++; + trace_bpf_testmod_test_read_bare(current, &ctx); return -EIO; /* always fail */ } diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/module_attach.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/module_attach.c index 50796b651f72..7085a118f38c 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/module_attach.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/module_attach.c @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ void test_module_attach(void) ASSERT_OK(trigger_module_test_read(READ_SZ), "trigger_read"); ASSERT_EQ(bss->raw_tp_read_sz, READ_SZ, "raw_tp"); + ASSERT_EQ(bss->raw_tp_bare_read_sz, READ_SZ+1, "raw_tp_bare"); ASSERT_EQ(bss->tp_btf_read_sz, READ_SZ, "tp_btf"); ASSERT_EQ(bss->fentry_read_sz, READ_SZ, "fentry"); ASSERT_EQ(bss->fentry_manual_read_sz, READ_SZ, "fentry_manual"); diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_module_attach.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_module_attach.c index efd1e287ac17..08aa157afa1d 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_module_attach.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_module_attach.c @@ -17,6 +17,16 @@ int BPF_PROG(handle_raw_tp, return 0; } +__u32 raw_tp_bare_read_sz = 0; + +SEC("raw_tp/bpf_testmod_test_read_bare") +int BPF_PROG(handle_raw_tp_bare, + struct task_struct *task, struct bpf_testmod_test_read_ctx *read_ctx) +{ + raw_tp_bare_read_sz = BPF_CORE_READ(read_ctx, len); + return 0; +} + __u32 tp_btf_read_sz = 0; SEC("tp_btf/bpf_testmod_test_read") -- 2.25.1