Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:2785:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id ia5csp2480566pxb; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 10:38:45 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw+bqkrMND2Cm0KEkiwCvTbzbW+5PNjP14mEjGd/l9xNu4AdpuhE7lNmO9KuVT3EVkChGy7 X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:2071:: with SMTP id qp17mr598784ejb.110.1610390324999; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 10:38:44 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1610390324; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Ix9Wvi6daNtm15SkpRwRnS1lSeW0VJQ5/wPcTe56kqltI+5YBi76y0benVLRREhuzB bQy88zcqsNlhxWKgEPIZTXD7iQ2GwgveCw9ByhUDXBLa0OvLDy8QkbuLApBrC4P/tYro gBg8YhO7uHcR32aQ8Tfs8Dtx7TqgzbPWB6ntju/ZNKFOBvZxdB3AXlUxdCIo8ceSdbNi ud9Ko5TjvmYQ5kxWcoXtgcO822bDv6absBa5z9vHP1v8z4w4J7YSwRXpbBvNhjRy37uJ yC8UQEZW0Orv3d+vEhQJoy5WjHYCbKHnZALi2+QKT+b2A75rmWDVR9ECDy1bsUa+uTWH aOAg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id; bh=5dNmeQKJ6wQEuAhsitHJUQ51YjpHgSj0rFq+e5ZxkdE=; b=MkoKHlafXIy2sr0N0rEbfu68dqVWJpXIquXMQfG9x6ryDjkXweFqqDECwKNbS6VFsj 7bFx+GSNc10gXKE0xDm0cmQCmbcaWAl3b3iQxCC79kOAE1c0X4t7RDdfcRZhfye8TrtK tWZlWygHJr+qY631TzyjgTMdpvWTZKuivZTFlUneuW4kvQSIc9fknUD6t/3GsgfLG2RY 4BqAGpYpQnbDWk70g1NZkq/n266b+Gmu5xkjTl1VJy1OSpzdt7R2BD/DW4gnvm/9APB3 u87zO4E9Rq96oyCKUNsXCutBHMIFe8t/TCixrhrrD63/zPJ7nkU57iDVZUXingTr/BJK qWaw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id cq19si237912edb.81.2021.01.11.10.38.21; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 10:38:44 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2390386AbhAKShT (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 11 Jan 2021 13:37:19 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:37994 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2390412AbhAKShS (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jan 2021 13:37:18 -0500 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05827ACB0; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 18:36:37 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1610390195.24361.20.camel@suse.cz> Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: PM: Register syscore_ops for scale invariance From: Giovanni Gherdovich To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Peter Zijlstra Cc: Linux PM , LKML , x86 Maintainers , Srinivas Pandruvada Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 19:36:35 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1803209.Mvru99baaF@kreacher> References: <1803209.Mvru99baaF@kreacher> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.26.6 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2021-01-08 at 19:05 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > From: Rafael J. Wysocki > > On x86 scale invariace tends to be disabled during resume from > suspend-to-RAM, because the MPERF or APERF MSR values are not as > expected then due to updates taking place after the platform > firmware has been invoked to complete the suspend transition. > > That, of course, is not desirable, especially if the schedutil > scaling governor is in use, because the lack of scale invariance > causes it to be less reliable. > > To counter that effect, modify init_freq_invariance() to register > a syscore_ops object for scale invariance with the ->resume callback > pointing to init_counter_refs() which will run on the CPU starting > the resume transition (the other CPUs will be taken care of the > "online" operations taking place later). > > Fixes: e2b0d619b400 ("x86, sched: check for counters overflow in frequency invariant accounting") > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki > Thanks for writing this, Rafael. Peter Zijlstra asked to fix this problem months ago; I started but got stucked and never finished. Giovanni Gherdovich