Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: unittest: Statically apply overlays using fdtoverlay
To:     Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc:     Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
        Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@konsulko.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
        anmar.oueja@linaro.org, Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
References: <be5cb12a68d9ac2c35ad9dd50d6b168f7cad6837.1609996381.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
 <1e42183ccafa1afba33b3e79a4e3efd3329fd133.1610095159.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
 <23e16d20-36eb-87d9-4473-142504ad8a95@gmail.com>
 <31611390-eded-d290-36a7-0b1e8465f71e@linaro.org>
 <20210112083703.yfpicoi4zrddeykd@vireshk-i7>
From:   Bill Mills <bill.mills@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <4a8bbbaa-9303-8a8c-1de4-38499b8151dd@linaro.org>
Date:   Tue, 12 Jan 2021 05:16:54 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20210112083703.yfpicoi4zrddeykd@vireshk-i7>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk


On 1/12/21 3:37 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 11-01-21, 20:22, Bill Mills wrote:
>> On 1/11/21 5:06 PM, Frank Rowand wrote:
>>> NACK to this specific patch, in its current form.
>>>
>>> There are restrictions on applying an overlay at runtime that do not apply
>>> to applying an overlay to an FDT that will be loaded by the kernel during
>>> early boot.  Thus the unittest overlays _must_ be applied using the kernel
>>> overlay loading methods to test the kernel runtime overlay loading feature.
>>>
>>> I agree that testing fdtoverlay is a good idea.  I have not looked at the
>>> parent project to see how much testing of fdtoverlay occurs there, but I
>>> would prefer that fdtoverlay tests reside in the parent project if practical
>>> and reasonable.  If there is some reason that some fdtoverlay tests are
>>> more practical in the Linux kernel repository then I am open to adding
>>> them to the Linux kernel tree.
> 
> I wasn't looking to add any testing for fdtoverlay in the kernel, but
> then I stumbled upon unit-tests here and thought it would be a good
> idea to get this built using static tools as well, as we aren't
> required to add any new source files for this and the existing tests
> already cover a lot of nodes.
> 
> And so I am fine if we don't want to do this stuff in kernel.
> 
>> I thought we were aligned that any new overlays into the kernel today would
>> only be for boot loader applied case.  Applying overlays at kernel runtime
>> was out of scope at your request.
>>
>> Rob had requested that the overlays be test applied at build time.  I don't
>> think there is any way to test the kernel runtime method at build time
>> correct?
>>
>> Please clarify your concern and your suggested way forward.
> 
> The kernel does some overlay testing currently (at kernel boot only,
> not later), to see if the overlays get applied correctly or not, these
> are the unit tests.
> 
> What Frank is probably saying is that the unit-tests dtbs shouldn't
> get used for testing fdtoverlay stuff. He isn't asking to support
> runtime application of overlays, but to not do fdtoverlay testing in
> the kernel.
> 

Thanks Viresh, that makes sense.  Sorry for the confusion Frank.

-- 
Bill Mills