Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:2785:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id ia5csp3160942pxb; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 07:46:32 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyVcq56nMArkUEU7LBTxd7FWuiaRhDcftd9JaumbJB4doDAqkLK1n89tSZJjU+KNebVqiY7 X-Received: by 2002:a50:d491:: with SMTP id s17mr3816977edi.169.1610466392244; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 07:46:32 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1610466392; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Sy0DE7uw+MDPSt+tj5fHptIr9490T36wNprX1oB/cUpgpH9+wPTMSpT/zki98Y9HMY FFEtYKNfbkWrK0WF3npuo4UNt99lGsC07nfRMiSzLmXiDv9ZgoAjr1toscd5QXgTvH/d 1sk0tiIULvVoykrxQk8CrPK3+nkxRD/6ISf7AyT+8hoS3dnMb2WgCRkcUFTPElPGD8sw cOQSZx5YaMgbaSo8dRQo3TdiAEJEUJjd6A0JKweKOmApV+GFXaOdAKuPJKX+NIh4tUL9 1+e3spf+3G2uS3jRgU6IbuqGXa/Hw6ezmnxTSx6SRmsHDS3j3SwTtbKbs6X0+iv4fifu wucA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:from:subject:references:mime-version :message-id:in-reply-to:date:sender:dkim-signature; bh=tGB99YSx8KogTviZ6Ti6Lxah9LwDjbLV5B13ld/gN08=; b=eYibCQHUSZgNZrTCv1tLqHLsVUIECuO/edrrWIJxsPxmWy1wuDYcNDaNKWrdecN9Cz pUWKR7xVqLOntRkqLKaW9PIHdW/1m70YUL1UdfZ6Gi68oaQ1Zku2ZH3r48RYnu4p5sTc KSongz4Pn0XuhSwuXYmPmgUjE+sDpkRNTdlPnSd0alVjbZl0VprTrRP8kOcUX6ottlTa 2oC1JmFQYf3J0oMs8dJvFZmZrg4B+Fl4HzwoFghLXzMEGSTiYHQDHdsC+kUGKr02PRek kKx8H/CKS+BY0afrHM+nRPkRTg/eUckGWbki1t/5/Xa52AekO0kGA9U+DTV6fXOAab/5 v2CA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=pjRPoAsB; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l11si684328eja.534.2021.01.12.07.46.08; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 07:46:32 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=pjRPoAsB; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2405107AbhALPoM (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 12 Jan 2021 10:44:12 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52956 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2405016AbhALPoH (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jan 2021 10:44:07 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-x34a.google.com (mail-wm1-x34a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::34a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1138C0617B0 for ; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 07:42:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wm1-x34a.google.com with SMTP id b184so529603wmh.6 for ; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 07:42:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:subject :from:to:cc; bh=tGB99YSx8KogTviZ6Ti6Lxah9LwDjbLV5B13ld/gN08=; b=pjRPoAsBoK75KL9ThAV3mSI77RE6HuuxES8Yl/2ehVLJq5HAmdPPsoYzpxnbk8ikqy K+GlpzGELlYXGIZYY3YUl8lBfb0uz2Enk0z0uFLG0tNmSDnab80KBg3JyiO8SOkPRqzT 3K981FJMqbV5mzfunu9Ph6SisoZmiPzDv9E3Nch1ceo3BjooSqT3mf/7oUHtmnuaMuDR DEee9yXooc07acLrUp0EvjRkk+PLofEpzak4lSFwFF3JjUAcUz2dazHriGRBbFFsvhmi Lq9/VVG8eEiTVDWCsFaI0ow8uhFtjnKKvU6K5+la+bqt3S6sLaA6HOSaDzSgqFhY/slZ cu/g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:from:to:cc; bh=tGB99YSx8KogTviZ6Ti6Lxah9LwDjbLV5B13ld/gN08=; b=WCoDqNcybbcKA1IyNRgQkTZ0bDUYOx9YuV2X3mGj2pRUQ8DpcejgrzNJQp1FTtyh8U 5HBuAJbA3GPLgIoBQ+312ZutgsrqSamo6me+MOF3E2plFK2Ho//UPUO0yCqJK0V+mlbA 8yYctkJV3ZQmW3cvfiY2dvtSMSnDBFm9JfYwBy9Bjn8VBoPbZm1sqSZAUxk27uOKj2VJ dJVYk99BbxX9gUJcZAUor2/2Nz2s5FosVX4QVLr5fkvVUPPtO/u/D50md9cTNN7W//HM 58LBM0H3GQGhdJAmtn+1YPVgBiDtjjm0yna8/frzskGHvglDwaYADrQW/EP5FwoFRGb9 vYKg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531hyNMiWU0C5fqyMyJKC7ccNGTCJoJHKZiR/vyfMccAJCZkhb/b C15I48O5VqfHgTOg+HSvNbcATOB7waBt+g== Sender: "jackmanb via sendgmr" X-Received: from beeg.c.googlers.com ([fda3:e722:ac3:cc00:28:9cb1:c0a8:11db]) (user=jackmanb job=sendgmr) by 2002:adf:df03:: with SMTP id y3mr4995277wrl.102.1610466174399; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 07:42:54 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 15:42:31 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20210112154235.2192781-1-jackmanb@google.com> Message-Id: <20210112154235.2192781-8-jackmanb@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20210112154235.2192781-1-jackmanb@google.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.0.284.gd98b1dd5eaa7-goog Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v6 07/11] bpf: Add instructions for atomic_[cmp]xchg From: Brendan Jackman To: bpf@vger.kernel.org Cc: Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Andrii Nakryiko , KP Singh , Florent Revest , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "=?UTF-8?q?Bj=C3=B6rn=20T=C3=B6pel?=" , John Fastabend , Yonghong Song , Brendan Jackman Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This adds two atomic opcodes, both of which include the BPF_FETCH flag. XCHG without the BPF_FETCH flag would naturally encode atomic_set. This is not supported because it would be of limited value to userspace (it doesn't imply any barriers). CMPXCHG without BPF_FETCH woulud be an atomic compare-and-write. We don't have such an operation in the kernel so it isn't provided to BPF either. There are two significant design decisions made for the CMPXCHG instruction: - To solve the issue that this operation fundamentally has 3 operands, but we only have two register fields. Therefore the operand we compare against (the kernel's API calls it 'old') is hard-coded to be R0. x86 has similar design (and A64 doesn't have this problem). A potential alternative might be to encode the other operand's register number in the immediate field. - The kernel's atomic_cmpxchg returns the old value, while the C11 userspace APIs return a boolean indicating the comparison result. Which should BPF do? A64 returns the old value. x86 returns the old value in the hard-coded register (and also sets a flag). That means return-old-value is easier to JIT, so that's what we use. Signed-off-by: Brendan Jackman Acked-by: Yonghong Song --- arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 8 ++++++++ include/linux/filter.h | 2 ++ include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 4 +++- kernel/bpf/core.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ kernel/bpf/disasm.c | 15 +++++++++++++++ kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++-- tools/include/linux/filter.h | 2 ++ tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 4 +++- 8 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c index eea7d8b0bb12..308241187582 100644 --- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c +++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c @@ -815,6 +815,14 @@ static int emit_atomic(u8 **pprog, u8 atomic_op, /* src_reg = atomic_fetch_add(dst_reg + off, src_reg); */ EMIT2(0x0F, 0xC1); break; + case BPF_XCHG: + /* src_reg = atomic_xchg(dst_reg + off, src_reg); */ + EMIT1(0x87); + break; + case BPF_CMPXCHG: + /* r0 = atomic_cmpxchg(dst_reg + off, r0, src_reg); */ + EMIT2(0x0F, 0xB1); + break; default: pr_err("bpf_jit: unknown atomic opcode %02x\n", atomic_op); return -EFAULT; diff --git a/include/linux/filter.h b/include/linux/filter.h index 3501f1fe36bb..ab2b2185f2d7 100644 --- a/include/linux/filter.h +++ b/include/linux/filter.h @@ -265,6 +265,8 @@ static inline bool insn_is_zext(const struct bpf_insn *insn) * * BPF_ADD *(uint *) (dst_reg + off16) += src_reg * BPF_ADD | BPF_FETCH src_reg = atomic_fetch_add(dst_reg + off16, src_reg); + * BPF_XCHG src_reg = atomic_xchg(dst_reg + off16, src_reg) + * BPF_CMPXCHG r0 = atomic_cmpxchg(dst_reg + off16, r0, src_reg) */ #define BPF_ATOMIC_OP(SIZE, OP, DST, SRC, OFF) \ diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h index 760ae333a5ed..0403c38bac52 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h @@ -45,7 +45,9 @@ #define BPF_EXIT 0x90 /* function return */ /* atomic op type fields (stored in immediate) */ -#define BPF_FETCH 0x01 /* fetch previous value into src reg */ +#define BPF_FETCH 0x01 /* not an opcode on its own, used to build others */ +#define BPF_XCHG (0xe0 | BPF_FETCH) /* atomic exchange */ +#define BPF_CMPXCHG (0xf0 | BPF_FETCH) /* atomic compare-and-write */ /* Register numbers */ enum { diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c index 2b1d3fea03fc..4f22cff4491e 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/core.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c @@ -1630,6 +1630,16 @@ static u64 ___bpf_prog_run(u64 *regs, const struct bpf_insn *insn, u64 *stack) (u32) SRC, (atomic_t *)(unsigned long) (DST + insn->off)); break; + case BPF_XCHG: + SRC = (u32) atomic_xchg( + (atomic_t *)(unsigned long) (DST + insn->off), + (u32) SRC); + break; + case BPF_CMPXCHG: + BPF_R0 = (u32) atomic_cmpxchg( + (atomic_t *)(unsigned long) (DST + insn->off), + (u32) BPF_R0, (u32) SRC); + break; default: goto default_label; } @@ -1647,6 +1657,16 @@ static u64 ___bpf_prog_run(u64 *regs, const struct bpf_insn *insn, u64 *stack) (u64) SRC, (atomic64_t *)(unsigned long) (DST + insn->off)); break; + case BPF_XCHG: + SRC = (u64) atomic64_xchg( + (atomic64_t *)(unsigned long) (DST + insn->off), + (u64) SRC); + break; + case BPF_CMPXCHG: + BPF_R0 = (u64) atomic64_cmpxchg( + (atomic64_t *)(unsigned long) (DST + insn->off), + (u64) BPF_R0, (u64) SRC); + break; default: goto default_label; } diff --git a/kernel/bpf/disasm.c b/kernel/bpf/disasm.c index d2e20f6d0516..ee8d1132767b 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/disasm.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/disasm.c @@ -167,6 +167,21 @@ void print_bpf_insn(const struct bpf_insn_cbs *cbs, BPF_SIZE(insn->code) == BPF_DW ? "64" : "", bpf_ldst_string[BPF_SIZE(insn->code) >> 3], insn->dst_reg, insn->off, insn->src_reg); + } else if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_ATOMIC && + insn->imm == BPF_CMPXCHG) { + verbose(cbs->private_data, "(%02x) r0 = atomic%s_cmpxchg((%s *)(r%d %+d), r0, r%d)\n", + insn->code, + BPF_SIZE(insn->code) == BPF_DW ? "64" : "", + bpf_ldst_string[BPF_SIZE(insn->code) >> 3], + insn->dst_reg, insn->off, + insn->src_reg); + } else if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_ATOMIC && + insn->imm == BPF_XCHG) { + verbose(cbs->private_data, "(%02x) r%d = atomic%s_xchg((%s *)(r%d %+d), r%d)\n", + insn->code, insn->src_reg, + BPF_SIZE(insn->code) == BPF_DW ? "64" : "", + bpf_ldst_string[BPF_SIZE(insn->code) >> 3], + insn->dst_reg, insn->off, insn->src_reg); } else { verbose(cbs->private_data, "BUG_%02x\n", insn->code); } diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index 449b2da9b6db..b1226bcd9765 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -3606,11 +3606,14 @@ static int check_mem_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, u32 regn static int check_atomic(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, struct bpf_insn *insn) { + int load_reg; int err; switch (insn->imm) { case BPF_ADD: case BPF_ADD | BPF_FETCH: + case BPF_XCHG: + case BPF_CMPXCHG: break; default: verbose(env, "BPF_ATOMIC uses invalid atomic opcode %02x\n", insn->imm); @@ -3632,6 +3635,13 @@ static int check_atomic(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, struct bpf_i if (err) return err; + if (insn->imm == BPF_CMPXCHG) { + /* Check comparison of R0 with memory location */ + err = check_reg_arg(env, BPF_REG_0, SRC_OP); + if (err) + return err; + } + if (is_pointer_value(env, insn->src_reg)) { verbose(env, "R%d leaks addr into mem\n", insn->src_reg); return -EACCES; @@ -3662,8 +3672,13 @@ static int check_atomic(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, struct bpf_i if (!(insn->imm & BPF_FETCH)) return 0; - /* check and record load of old value into src reg */ - err = check_reg_arg(env, insn->src_reg, DST_OP); + if (insn->imm == BPF_CMPXCHG) + load_reg = BPF_REG_0; + else + load_reg = insn->src_reg; + + /* check and record load of old value */ + err = check_reg_arg(env, load_reg, DST_OP); if (err) return err; diff --git a/tools/include/linux/filter.h b/tools/include/linux/filter.h index 7211ce9fba53..d75998b0d5ac 100644 --- a/tools/include/linux/filter.h +++ b/tools/include/linux/filter.h @@ -174,6 +174,8 @@ * * BPF_ADD *(uint *) (dst_reg + off16) += src_reg * BPF_ADD | BPF_FETCH src_reg = atomic_fetch_add(dst_reg + off16, src_reg); + * BPF_XCHG src_reg = atomic_xchg(dst_reg + off16, src_reg) + * BPF_CMPXCHG r0 = atomic_cmpxchg(dst_reg + off16, r0, src_reg) */ #define BPF_ATOMIC_OP(SIZE, OP, DST, SRC, OFF) \ diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h index 760ae333a5ed..0403c38bac52 100644 --- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h +++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h @@ -45,7 +45,9 @@ #define BPF_EXIT 0x90 /* function return */ /* atomic op type fields (stored in immediate) */ -#define BPF_FETCH 0x01 /* fetch previous value into src reg */ +#define BPF_FETCH 0x01 /* not an opcode on its own, used to build others */ +#define BPF_XCHG (0xe0 | BPF_FETCH) /* atomic exchange */ +#define BPF_CMPXCHG (0xf0 | BPF_FETCH) /* atomic compare-and-write */ /* Register numbers */ enum { -- 2.30.0.284.gd98b1dd5eaa7-goog