Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751349AbWIKTsZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Sep 2006 15:48:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751351AbWIKTsZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Sep 2006 15:48:25 -0400 Received: from smtp-out001.kontent.com ([81.88.40.215]:51395 "EHLO smtp-out.kontent.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751349AbWIKTsY convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Sep 2006 15:48:24 -0400 From: Oliver Neukum To: paulmck@us.ibm.com Subject: Re: Uses for memory barriers Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 21:48:42 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 Cc: Alan Stern , David Howells , Kernel development list References: <200609090049.20416.oliver@neukum.org> <20060911162059.GA1496@us.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20060911162059.GA1496@us.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200609112148.42302.oliver@neukum.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 510 Lines: 14 Am Montag, 11. September 2006 18:21 schrieb Paul E. McKenney: > 1.??????A given CPU will always perceive its own memory operations > ????????as occuring in program order. Is this true for physical memory if virtually indexed caches are involved? Regards Oliver - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/