Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] KVM: arm64: vgic-v3: Expose GICR_TYPER.Last for
 userspace
To:     Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>, eric.auger.pro@gmail.com,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
        kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, maz@kernel.org, drjones@redhat.com
Cc:     james.morse@arm.com, julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com,
        suzuki.poulose@arm.com, shuah@kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com
References: <20201212185010.26579-1-eric.auger@redhat.com>
 <20201212185010.26579-9-eric.auger@redhat.com>
From:   Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
Message-ID: <45a364ec-eac6-a04b-9654-e97970186839@arm.com>
Date:   Tue, 12 Jan 2021 17:02:36 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20201212185010.26579-9-eric.auger@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Precedence: bulk

Hi Eric,

On 12/12/20 6:50 PM, Eric Auger wrote:
> Commit 23bde34771f1 ("KVM: arm64: vgic-v3: Drop the
> reporting of GICR_TYPER.Last for userspace") temporarily fixed
> a bug identified when attempting to access the GICR_TYPER
> register before the redistributor region setting but dropped
> the support of the LAST bit. This patch restores its
> support (if the redistributor region was set) while keeping the
> code safe.

I suppose the reason for emulating GICR_TYPER.Last is for architecture compliance,
right? I think that should be in the commit message.

>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c | 7 ++++++-
>  include/kvm/arm_vgic.h             | 1 +
>  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c
> index 581f0f490000..2f9ef6058f6e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c
> @@ -277,6 +277,8 @@ static unsigned long vgic_uaccess_read_v3r_typer(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  						 gpa_t addr, unsigned int len)
>  {
>  	unsigned long mpidr = kvm_vcpu_get_mpidr_aff(vcpu);
> +	struct vgic_cpu *vgic_cpu = &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu;
> +	struct vgic_redist_region *rdreg = vgic_cpu->rdreg;
>  	int target_vcpu_id = vcpu->vcpu_id;
>  	u64 value;
>  
> @@ -286,7 +288,9 @@ static unsigned long vgic_uaccess_read_v3r_typer(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  	if (vgic_has_its(vcpu->kvm))
>  		value |= GICR_TYPER_PLPIS;
>  
> -	/* reporting of the Last bit is not supported for userspace */
> +	if (rdreg && (vgic_cpu->rdreg_index == (rdreg->free_index - 1)))
> +		value |= GICR_TYPER_LAST;
> +
>  	return extract_bytes(value, addr & 7, len);
>  }
>  
> @@ -714,6 +718,7 @@ int vgic_register_redist_iodev(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	vgic_cpu->rdreg = rdreg;
> +	vgic_cpu->rdreg_index = rdreg->free_index;

What happens if the next redistributor region we register has the base address
adjacent to this one?

I'm really not familiar with the code, but is it not possible to create two
Redistributor regions (via
KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_GRP_ADDR(KVM_VGIC_V3_ADDR_TYPE_REDIST)) where the second
Redistributor region start address is immediately after the last Redistributor in
the preceding region?

Thanks,
Alex
>  
>  	rd_base = rdreg->base + rdreg->free_index * KVM_VGIC_V3_REDIST_SIZE;
>  
> diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
> index a8d8fdcd3723..596c069263a7 100644
> --- a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
> +++ b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
> @@ -322,6 +322,7 @@ struct vgic_cpu {
>  	 */
>  	struct vgic_io_device	rd_iodev;
>  	struct vgic_redist_region *rdreg;
> +	u32 rdreg_index;
>  
>  	/* Contains the attributes and gpa of the LPI pending tables. */
>  	u64 pendbaser;