Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:2785:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id ia5csp3448847pxb; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 15:15:07 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwNMGm67a1U/rqP30xFa6hFU0AsSvKo723Y6K9xM1OlNp0sR13VHQJ0VhMOCn52CY3sKbNU X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:77c5:: with SMTP id m5mr759161ejn.424.1610493307444; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 15:15:07 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1610493307; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=efroofR8/tzJPETvzrrjr1dBX0Q3CFL1siNQaXoPHfMpnSgYm/wYZVjlzYPARSaJCA RQIrszFnEvg99Tp2Iru9fpQ0EQqQKs1cvuejGSQ/vD+wthDXCZjPk2LaL06BUkE7Lfuu N1RVwPCpweEPM4xHaB7ydwYLUTM9Eb9a0kj/fMnbvhxAoXR+Qmx4JOvvTZi6YrsE+PeG /dBoe+koKVKDeYHjvpDcMCipxue7ROe0oD+YQ41KjqW9K8efio6AZVOFqVoyXbqbYs35 MXGkp3z9X7VMnNxplMM4NZuM3AR08hDmjEdSJZunA51+FzeQz7OZCPt1JFDgQuR3ThR5 MbDw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=BO9LKMYm6WLALY7iBHQnXtdADoInL5KOrbTeEAsVWyI=; b=tSAlMeKeLo3rLucpV1lLjYR4XU/Z/2uOxiVn3Z7sJvsPwOvBxDn58y56P7Y7kFoOyB dCWa9nH3SyTM80VAwffhNJ0fiEbtfMe+nMYisXzbi/Wt4hUo/WBV5l8NYaZCwfrOL5vA iyE6jLtQNHIQNjGMVvVc7N6hMBQvhdMNBfRe9rkWtM4Wda0dBm3TjKfkJo2mAe+J2Cpa UoRxSjyQl0InabJ6EHTa5pxC8tB+yE1S/fH4NAG+xaRE+5ZzVLZmiW7TleKRlynYgabp Rp3cejy+z4fMcJ4DkqU7I7ibG841H6EKHJo0HxRlTSgkHAD6tdJzTLbA0Qmh8Yu6veyq KQZQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=YlV263n9; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f25si80751ejh.688.2021.01.12.15.14.43; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 15:15:07 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=YlV263n9; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2404277AbhALIFv (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 12 Jan 2021 03:05:51 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38892 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730252AbhALIFt (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jan 2021 03:05:49 -0500 Received: from mail-qk1-x72a.google.com (mail-qk1-x72a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD764C061786 for ; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 00:05:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qk1-x72a.google.com with SMTP id 143so1136446qke.10 for ; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 00:05:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=BO9LKMYm6WLALY7iBHQnXtdADoInL5KOrbTeEAsVWyI=; b=YlV263n9tQpbBt9fnNBpy7Qa2HIPPIYUSnUvNbLEDrYwVNxX7ckWG3jSQ76sjL0JtW lbwVttNbrBHqTjUZcF5soBSH5wQbg65dZg83dq7YFsi09CLZqXpSbRYUDIwkjNS0Cbd4 JXqv9fo4bW6zfG88NRnCEYX41fgpnmHHTVSkIsu+snmHRoE73B2cTyUuNQSZUmfcYmld pKQ13QosGGuoDL/HUbK4+TGUMghPluqwdlDtM0fCbtOVUQ4dUdmlpnsPHAX+J4ysHOEj oS6qQ5b/21tUVcWmgV4ivS1gHVM8B2Qw57AqK6A4afHthAuxaOlnib5OnhsXshRBmicy jt0Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=BO9LKMYm6WLALY7iBHQnXtdADoInL5KOrbTeEAsVWyI=; b=ZCkO/mZvdRXCWIlTjEg9jOALYgruIbupKoYOqZhTPIwk51RXMLqJJ3jTEMgJxMqaFA 4h4lWZw477c9GliLcYwFSGR4dFpA6bmontXYXSvpCvGp8A3NblG7Pbhx4aFCTjfmi5N7 i2N9DdL33SZ2lAsSrLTpNwmWELQ3znpM8StKhFgQzdeK5DMH2FwCloYn39K67xCTjJ/B KJgxRonaAmDCev5xU0ANCkp8YTKIvq0oHekIEi/f89D3aZo9V46CvkXEnv8Bxm/dq8ZQ tS+vF55tw5Ic/t14rDAydikNl0eBRcXUQ8u7a8vYCB5GH/Kml9b5r13GAgjBHICn+WKF OzGA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532uUK82scYYD16TnXyOiKHS6SY/01OG6UkxtB7CScqB+JF/Gw6W jmcpju8zK/90fJsoKNnq2NX5OViGFGLRZLRDQerC9g== X-Received: by 2002:a37:a747:: with SMTP id q68mr3277569qke.352.1610438706711; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 00:05:06 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <0f20f867d747b678604a68173a5f20fb8df9b756.1609871239.git.andreyknvl@google.com> In-Reply-To: <0f20f867d747b678604a68173a5f20fb8df9b756.1609871239.git.andreyknvl@google.com> From: Alexander Potapenko Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 09:04:54 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/11] kasan: add match-all tag tests To: Andrey Konovalov Cc: Catalin Marinas , Vincenzo Frascino , Dmitry Vyukov , Marco Elver , Andrew Morton , Will Deacon , Andrey Ryabinin , Evgenii Stepanov , Branislav Rankov , Kevin Brodsky , kasan-dev , Linux ARM , Linux Memory Management List , LKML Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 7:28 PM Andrey Konovalov wrote: > > Add 3 new tests for tag-based KASAN modes: > > 1. Check that match-all pointer tag is not assigned randomly. > 2. Check that 0xff works as a match-all pointer tag. > 3. Check that there are no match-all memory tags. > > Note, that test #3 causes a significant number (255) of KASAN reports > to be printed during execution for the SW_TAGS mode. > > Signed-off-by: Andrey Konovalov > Link: https://linux-review.googlesource.com/id/I78f1375efafa162b37f3abcb2c5bc2f3955dfd8e > --- > lib/test_kasan.c | 93 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > mm/kasan/kasan.h | 6 ++++ > 2 files changed, 99 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/lib/test_kasan.c b/lib/test_kasan.c > index 46e578c8e842..f1eda0bcc780 100644 > --- a/lib/test_kasan.c > +++ b/lib/test_kasan.c > @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ > #include > #include > #include > +#include > #include > #include > #include > @@ -790,6 +791,95 @@ static void vmalloc_oob(struct kunit *test) > vfree(area); > } > > +/* > + * Check that match-all pointer tag is not assigned randomly for > + * tag-based modes. > + */ > +static void match_all_not_assigned(struct kunit *test) > +{ Do we want to run this test in non-tag-based modes? Probably not?