Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 5 Nov 2001 03:16:23 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 5 Nov 2001 03:16:13 -0500 Received: from zero.tech9.net ([209.61.188.187]:57102 "EHLO zero.tech9.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 5 Nov 2001 03:15:56 -0500 Subject: Re: 2.4.13-ac5-preempt, overflow in cached memory stat? From: Robert Love To: Zwane Mwaikambo Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/0.16.99+cvs.2001.10.28.13.59 (Preview Release) Date: 05 Nov 2001 03:15:46 -0500 Message-Id: <1004948146.806.4.camel@phantasy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2001-11-05 at 03:21, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote: > Thanks, I just saw a thread discussing the very same issue i had, i'll > download both ac7 and the ac6 preempt patch and give it a try. Please let me know.. I've had a few reports and I want to consider this bug fixed -- and not even our fault: the best kind. I went ahead and rediffed the patch against 2.4.13-ac7, the -ac6 will apply fine. For future use however, it will be up at ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rml/preempt-kernel/ soon as the it syncs. > PS I know you keep hearing this, but that preempt patch makes for some > damn smooth interactive performance ;) I can't hear it enough :) Robert Love - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/