Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751311AbWILGJe (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Sep 2006 02:09:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751324AbWILGJe (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Sep 2006 02:09:34 -0400 Received: from py-out-1112.google.com ([64.233.166.177]:22725 "EHLO py-out-1112.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751311AbWILGJd (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Sep 2006 02:09:33 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=r9e1SvY3yLhlP350Wr9esyXb65F0y1RN4bGt8SD1lUptErXaO18kiER1uqrDGYQhZw4z6xDiQb5frcDsuEMFsOJ178tCKmvxcn9bnGywU+ViJZU7i+9y+6pCjHLEmH3JTw43Ylt0lyjenjMeJ3RJ3LiSPghIUVm+wNUS3cBWpI4= Message-ID: <653402b90609112309p7be570a2ra9e1c22ad9c7a0d7@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 08:09:22 +0200 From: "Miguel Ojeda" To: "Greg KH" Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.17.13] display: Driver ks0108 and cfag12864b Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20060912035131.GA27472@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <653402b90609111627q661cded8l757129311fbe92d4@mail.gmail.com> <20060912035131.GA27472@kroah.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1952 Lines: 60 On 9/12/06, Greg KH wrote: > > The patch is linewrapped :( > Please tell me if the next one is linewrapped too. > > Why would you need to touch udev? It will handle stuff loaded at any > point in time automatically. You don't have to "update udev" at all. > My fault. My firsts tests were on a Vector Linux, and, I don't know why (bad cfg I guess), but udev didn't create the nodes automatically. Now, in Debian, it does. I have noticed that and the last patch doesn't have such lines. Sorry. > > Do you really mean for your header file to be under the GPL for > userspace programs? > Ups, it is just an example for a user-space program that wants to use the cfag12864b. I will remove the License line anyway. > > Which version of the GPL? > The same as the kernel, I think. Is that right? > [about useless printk's] > Is this really needed? > It isn't anymore. In the patch it is also removed and all the printks improved, as Alexey Dobriyan told me also to do. > "Display" is very generic, people will think it is for video stuff too. > LCD perhaps might be better? > I thought the same, but LCD is already used by the "PDA Frontal LCD Panel". They got the "linux/lcd.h" and "drivers/lcd/*", as well as a fixed major number. So I thought "bigger" and, IMHO a new folder for this kind of misc-secondary-display devices (LCD or not) will be fine. I think (maybe I'm wrong but...), we can just put the drivers right there. There are a lot of this kind of hardware, but it will take time to code more drivers. So if the resulting drivers are so different or the drivers/* get a major update, relocate them. If not, leave them until we have enough samples to start classifying. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/