Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:2785:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id ia5csp378990pxb; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 06:07:31 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw2IQACCyCWCEsvavHgF7CoFgSdjnidEv+OAxKUfOkNw8mo19br7+Y9oK1pUyxcgYr8TXMw X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:8d5:: with SMTP id d21mr1970309edz.57.1610546851623; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 06:07:31 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1610546851; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=uVjbCBhuXAtUQJqPrTLx8dwAzJFp2j59apXdO+p+8A1AEy1hkJKdi39TZLIUpALteG 576rSl2p+ZdFCl2mqCSSmW5BU56iX9lR9nATxPlB8vpsEZUEkyouG5nvrTshftAU0spN BUPhuyByEENGSBGZxvsnaKCym51Y+FwNQL4FWLhcZth1FK+tZDxph2RxbNSURXv2PmkF Cc+tf8cZoOrHweYECX4XZWru5c5nIdrntsIp/Ynn3zkSTmCrlPlOLV7vUKZPVUmGuLH/ 7QazPNzOLmXqoBzh0u2N+IbJlB0/fN/A/f+/8YmIzx7wF0tcGqRSOkP8m8Q1uGQ1tJGv yMKw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:dmarc-filter :sender:dkim-signature; bh=kk8JFI24A13gOE/9zp1nevr+Dpd0ltUMl4RWOmeOO1g=; b=owqPIq9KD79arxkQrXqMHbRnWI9kdCduXSfVeBKNgrOMtq5WMuipgEC9A4zx5LPSIZ 57HkKJsCGWHxpB0luYn4bqYCX1TD0yGJzRCCpDjylwg4LxHFAwh4rD5Sjdp1psPEtz7C rxxb3kg9DvHqBEv7IMIYb6mgYq0M4Yu43JCrWSqp//S9HXO54BZ4bjAFe/oERq7ObQsz A+V9V4UX483Hd0H1wzcIeXhzAwuBhO4AKQxU9SpAkfzKGDrd+9cEAM6RKxSd8g3A1Epj iuqNFQo7ty2VEYtCDaYi+ax9rN5hLJPdM7ay1hQQcfhV/VtPcHbzLtR4kHycMw19AmuD BAHA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@mg.codeaurora.org header.s=smtp header.b=Oz5PiLaK; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b32si1112435edf.406.2021.01.13.06.06.58; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 06:07:31 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@mg.codeaurora.org header.s=smtp header.b=Oz5PiLaK; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726428AbhAMOFO (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 13 Jan 2021 09:05:14 -0500 Received: from so254-31.mailgun.net ([198.61.254.31]:46525 "EHLO so254-31.mailgun.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726398AbhAMOFN (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jan 2021 09:05:13 -0500 DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; v=1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mg.codeaurora.org; q=dns/txt; s=smtp; t=1610546694; h=Message-Id: Date: Subject: Cc: To: From: Sender; bh=kk8JFI24A13gOE/9zp1nevr+Dpd0ltUMl4RWOmeOO1g=; b=Oz5PiLaKmD0rEQnpwTECmmqH2ILEnYpDG9v54RlId2tWLzB2YJRKNCpo6VZyqxK2pUHhrFJf v244SBxdRrNRtbi0wYYTXMyI+/gF5wMxLgNXcsBx4BASiU96r+nKhvktkCKGMwgBtCsxV4LB e6epHvzhre+QHmBd8At2dnwXVJA= X-Mailgun-Sending-Ip: 198.61.254.31 X-Mailgun-Sid: WyI0MWYwYSIsICJsaW51eC1rZXJuZWxAdmdlci5rZXJuZWwub3JnIiwgImJlOWU0YSJd Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org (ec2-35-166-182-171.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [35.166.182.171]) by smtp-out-n04.prod.us-east-1.postgun.com with SMTP id 5ffefdb5c88af0610783af6b (version=TLS1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256); Wed, 13 Jan 2021 14:03:33 GMT Sender: charante=codeaurora.org@mg.codeaurora.org Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id B9735C43462; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 14:03:32 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-caf-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=2.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00,SPF_FAIL, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from charante-linux.qualcomm.com (unknown [202.46.22.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: charante) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F0EB3C433C6; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 14:03:28 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org F0EB3C433C6 Authentication-Results: aws-us-west-2-caf-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: aws-us-west-2-caf-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=charante@codeaurora.org From: Charan Teja Reddy To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, mhocko@suse.com, vbabka@suse.cz, khalid.aziz@oracle.com, ngupta@nitingupta.dev, vinmenon@codeaurora.org Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Charan Teja Reddy Subject: [PATCH] mm/compaction: return proper state in should_proactive_compact_node Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 19:33:06 +0530 Message-Id: <1610546586-18998-1-git-send-email-charante@codeaurora.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org should_proactive_compact_node() returns true when sum of the fragmentation score of all the zones in the node is greater than the wmark_high of compaction which then triggers the proactive compaction that operates on the individual zones of the node. But proactive compaction runs on the zone only when the fragmentation score of the zone is greater than wmark_low(=wmark_high - 10). This means that the sum of the fragmentation scores of all the zones can exceed the wmark_high but individual zone scores can still be less than the wmark_low which makes the unnecessary trigger of the proactive compaction only to return doing nothing. Another issue with the return of proactive compaction with out even trying is its deferral. It is simply deferred for 1 << COMPACT_MAX_DEFER_SHIFT if the scores across the proactive compaction is same, thinking that compaction didn't make any progress but in reality it didn't even try. With the delay between successive retries for proactive compaction is 500msec, it can result into the deferral for ~30sec with out even trying the proactive compaction. Test scenario is that: compaction_proactiveness=50 thus the wmark_low = 50 and wmark_high = 60. System have 2 zones(Normal and Movable) with sizes 5GB and 6GB respectively. After opening some apps on the android, the fragmentation scores of these zones are 47 and 49 respectively. Since the sum of these fragmentation scores are above the wmark_high which triggers the proactive compaction and there since the individual zone scores are below wmark_low, it returns without trying the compaction. As a result the fragmentation scores of the zones are still 47 and 49 which makes the existing logic to defer the compaction thinking that noprogress is made across the compaction. So, run the proactive compaction on the node zones only when atleast one of the zones fragmentation score is greater than wmark_low. This avoids the unnecessary deferral and retries of the compaction. Signed-off-by: Charan Teja Reddy --- mm/compaction.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c index e5acb97..f7a772a 100644 --- a/mm/compaction.c +++ b/mm/compaction.c @@ -1964,6 +1964,26 @@ static unsigned int fragmentation_score_node(pg_data_t *pgdat) return score; } +/* + * Returns the maximum of fragmentation scores of zones in a node. This is + * used in taking the decission of whether to trigger the proactive compaction + * on the zones of this node. + */ +static unsigned int fragmentation_score_node_zones_max(pg_data_t *pgdat) +{ + int zoneid; + unsigned int max = 0; + + for (zoneid = 0; zoneid < MAX_NR_ZONES; zoneid++) { + struct zone *zone; + + zone = &pgdat->node_zones[zoneid]; + max = max_t(unsigned int, fragmentation_score_zone(zone), max); + } + + return max; +} + static unsigned int fragmentation_score_wmark(pg_data_t *pgdat, bool low) { unsigned int wmark_low; @@ -1979,13 +1999,16 @@ static unsigned int fragmentation_score_wmark(pg_data_t *pgdat, bool low) static bool should_proactive_compact_node(pg_data_t *pgdat) { - int wmark_high; + int wmark_low, wmark_high; if (!sysctl_compaction_proactiveness || kswapd_is_running(pgdat)) return false; wmark_high = fragmentation_score_wmark(pgdat, false); - return fragmentation_score_node(pgdat) > wmark_high; + wmark_low = fragmentation_score_wmark(pgdat, true); + + return fragmentation_score_node(pgdat) > wmark_high && + fragmentation_score_node_zones_max(pgdat) > wmark_low; } static enum compact_result __compact_finished(struct compact_control *cc) -- QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation